ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

By IT ADMIN ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is a Technical Report titled “Health informatics – Interoperability of telehealth systems and networks – Part 1: Introduction and definitions.” This part of the Technical Report provides foundational information and terminology related to the interoperability of telehealth systems and networks. Here’s an overview of ISO/TR 16056-1:2004:

Title:

Health informatics – Interoperability of telehealth systems and networks – Part 1: Introduction and definitions

Type:

Technical Report (TR)

Published by:

International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

Scope and Purpose:

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 serves as an introductory document to the broader series of Technical Reports on telehealth interoperability. Its main objectives include:

  • Introduction to Telehealth Interoperability: Provides an overview of the challenges, principles, and importance of interoperability in telehealth systems and networks.
  • Terminology and Definitions: Establishes a common set of terms and definitions specific to telehealth interoperability. This ensures clarity and consistency in communication among stakeholders.
  • Conceptual Framework: Introduces the conceptual framework for understanding telehealth interoperability, laying the groundwork for subsequent parts of the series that delve into technical details and implementation guidelines.

Key Components:

  1. Introduction to Telehealth: Provides context on the role of telehealth in healthcare delivery and the benefits of interoperability in enhancing telehealth services.
  2. Definitions: Establishes definitions for key terms and concepts related to telehealth interoperability, ensuring a common understanding among stakeholders.
  3. Challenges and Considerations: Discusses the challenges and considerations specific to achieving interoperability in telehealth systems, such as technical standards, data exchange formats, and security requirements.

Benefits and Applications:

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 benefits stakeholders involved in telehealth systems and networks, including:

  • Healthcare Providers: Gain foundational knowledge and terminology essential for planning and implementing interoperable telehealth solutions.
  • Telehealth Technology Developers: Use the defined terms and conceptual framework as a basis for designing interoperable telehealth systems and networks.
  • Policymakers and Regulators: Understand the foundational principles of telehealth interoperability to inform policy development and regulatory frameworks.
  • Standards Organizations: Establish a starting point for developing standards and guidelines that promote interoperability in telehealth systems.

Industry Relevance:

As the first part of the ISO/TR 16056 series, ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 provides a crucial foundation for subsequent technical reports and standards addressing telehealth interoperability. It lays the groundwork for standardized approaches to enhance interoperability, improve healthcare delivery, and support global collaboration in telehealth technology.

Conclusion:

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 serves as an essential document for establishing common terminology and foundational principles in the field of telehealth interoperability. By providing clarity and guidance, it supports stakeholders in developing and implementing interoperable telehealth solutions that enhance patient care, streamline operations, and promote innovation in healthcare delivery.

WHAT IS ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is a Technical Report published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) under the title “Health informatics – Interoperability of telehealth systems and networks – Part 1: Introduction and definitions.”

Overview:

  1. Type: ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is categorized as a Technical Report (TR). Unlike standards, which provide specific requirements, TRs offer guidance, explanations, and recommendations on a particular subject—in this case, telehealth system interoperability.
  2. Publication Year: It was published in 2004, meaning it reflects the understanding and practices of that time in the field of health informatics, particularly in relation to telehealth systems.
  3. Scope: The primary purpose of ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is to provide an introductory framework and establish common terminology and definitions relevant to the interoperability of telehealth systems and networks. It does not specify technical requirements but rather sets the stage for subsequent parts of the series that delve deeper into technical aspects and implementation guidelines.

Key Components:

  • Introduction to Telehealth Interoperability: It introduces the concept of interoperability in telehealth systems, highlighting its importance in enhancing healthcare delivery through remote monitoring, consultations, and data exchange.
  • Terminology and Definitions: ISO/TR 16056-1 defines key terms and concepts specific to telehealth interoperability. This ensures clarity and consistency in communication among stakeholders involved in telehealth system development and implementation.
  • Conceptual Framework: It establishes a conceptual framework for understanding how telehealth systems should interact with each other and with existing healthcare information systems. This framework forms the basis for subsequent standards and guidelines aimed at achieving interoperability.

Purpose and Benefits:

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 serves several purposes and provides benefits to various stakeholders in the healthcare and telehealth sectors:

  • Foundation: It lays the foundation for developing standards and best practices related to telehealth interoperability.
  • Guidance: Offers guidance on the challenges, principles, and considerations involved in achieving interoperability in telehealth systems.
  • Standardization: Helps in standardizing terminology and definitions, which are essential for promoting interoperability and communication across different telehealth platforms and technologies.
  • Education: Provides educational material for healthcare professionals, technology developers, policymakers, and regulatory bodies to understand the fundamental aspects of telehealth interoperability.

Conclusion:

In summary, ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is an introductory Technical Report that establishes the groundwork for addressing interoperability challenges within telehealth systems. By defining key terms and concepts and providing a conceptual framework, it supports the development and implementation of interoperable telehealth solutions aimed at improving healthcare efficiency, accessibility, and patient outcomes.

WHO IS REQUIRED ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, being a Technical Report (TR) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), does not impose mandatory requirements like standards. Therefore, it is not required in a legal or regulatory sense by any specific entity or jurisdiction.

However, the guidance and definitions provided in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can be beneficial and relevant to various stakeholders involved in the development, implementation, and regulation of telehealth systems. Here are some groups of people who might find ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 useful:

  1. Healthcare Providers and Organizations: Healthcare institutions and providers looking to implement telehealth solutions can benefit from ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 by gaining a clear understanding of interoperability concepts and terminology. This understanding can help them effectively communicate their requirements to telehealth technology vendors and ensure compatibility with existing healthcare IT systems.
  2. Telehealth Technology Developers: Companies and developers involved in creating telehealth software, devices, and systems can use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 as a reference to align their products with industry-standard definitions and concepts. This can facilitate interoperability between different telehealth platforms and enhance their market acceptance.
  3. Regulatory and Policy Authorities: While ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 itself is not a regulatory document, its definitions and conceptual framework can inform the development of telehealth-related regulations and policies. Policymakers and regulatory authorities can use the TR to understand interoperability requirements and promote standardized practices in telehealth implementations.
  4. Standards Organizations and Industry Consortia: Organizations involved in setting standards and guidelines for healthcare IT and telehealth can reference ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 in their efforts to establish interoperability standards. This can foster consistency and compatibility across different telehealth systems and networks.
  5. Educational Institutions and Researchers: Academic institutions and researchers studying telehealth systems and interoperability can use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 as a foundational resource. It provides a structured framework and terminology that can guide research efforts and contribute to advancements in telehealth technology and practices.

In conclusion, while ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is not mandatory, its adoption and understanding can be valuable for stakeholders across the healthcare and telehealth sectors. It provides essential definitions and a conceptual framework that promote clarity, consistency, and interoperability in telehealth system development and implementation.

WHEN IS REQUIRED ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, as a Technical Report (TR) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), does not impose mandatory requirements or deadlines like formal standards. Therefore, it is not required to be implemented or followed by a specific deadline.

However, the content and guidance provided in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can be considered relevant and beneficial at various stages of telehealth system development and implementation. Here are some instances when ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 might be particularly useful:

  1. Initial Planning and Requirements Definition: During the early stages of planning a telehealth project, stakeholders can refer to ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to establish common terminology and definitions related to interoperability. This ensures that all parties involved have a shared understanding of key concepts and objectives.
  2. Telehealth System Design and Development: Telehealth technology developers and engineers can use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 as a reference when designing interoperable telehealth systems. The definitions and conceptual framework provided in the TR can guide the development of system architectures that support seamless data exchange and integration with existing healthcare IT infrastructure.
  3. Procurement and Vendor Selection: Healthcare organizations procuring telehealth solutions can include adherence to ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 guidelines as part of their procurement criteria. This helps ensure that the selected vendors understand and apply recognized interoperability principles in their products.
  4. Regulatory Compliance and Policy Development: While ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 itself is not a regulatory document, its definitions and guidance can inform the development of telehealth-related regulations and policies. Policymakers and regulators can reference the TR to promote standardized practices and interoperability requirements in telehealth implementations.
  5. Training and Education: Healthcare professionals and IT staff involved in telehealth initiatives can benefit from training sessions and educational programs that incorporate ISO/TR 16056-1:2004. Understanding the terminology and concepts defined in the TR can enhance their ability to effectively implement and use interoperable telehealth systems.

In summary, ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 is relevant throughout the lifecycle of telehealth system development and implementation. While there is no specific deadline for compliance, stakeholders can leverage the TR’s guidance to improve interoperability, efficiency, and effectiveness in telehealth service delivery.

WHERE IS REQUIRED ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part1:Introduction and definitions

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, being a Technical Report (TR) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), does not have specific geographic or jurisdictional requirements where it must be implemented or followed. TRs like ISO/TR 16056-1 provide guidance, definitions, and recommendations rather than mandatory standards.

However, the principles and definitions outlined in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can be considered relevant and applicable globally wherever telehealth systems and networks are being developed, implemented, or regulated. Here are some general contexts where ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 may be considered beneficial:

  1. Global Telehealth Initiatives: Organizations and initiatives focused on advancing telehealth technologies and interoperability standards on a global scale may adopt ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 as a reference. This promotes consistency and interoperability across different regions and healthcare systems.
  2. Healthcare Providers: Healthcare institutions and providers worldwide can use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to establish common terminology and definitions related to telehealth interoperability. This facilitates clearer communication and alignment of goals when implementing telehealth solutions.
  3. Telehealth Technology Developers: Companies developing telehealth software, devices, and systems can refer to ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to ensure their products adhere to recognized interoperability principles. This supports compatibility with diverse healthcare IT environments and enhances market acceptance.
  4. Regulatory and Policy Development: While ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 itself is not a regulatory document, its definitions and guidance can inform the development of telehealth-related regulations and policies in various jurisdictions. Policymakers and regulators may reference the TR to promote standardized practices and interoperability requirements.
  5. Education and Training: Academic institutions, training providers, and professional organizations involved in healthcare informatics and telehealth education can incorporate ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 into their curriculum. This helps educate future healthcare professionals and IT specialists on interoperability concepts and best practices.

In conclusion, ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 provides foundational guidance on telehealth interoperability that can be applied globally. While not mandated in any specific location, its principles support the development and implementation of interoperable telehealth systems across diverse healthcare environments and regulatory frameworks worldwide.

HOW IS REQUIRED ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 PART1: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, as a Technical Report (TR) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), does not impose mandatory requirements or specify how it must be implemented in a regulatory sense. Instead, it provides guidance, definitions, and recommendations regarding the interoperability of telehealth systems and networks. Here’s how ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can be considered essential or beneficial in various contexts:

  1. Foundation for Interoperability: ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 establishes a foundational framework of definitions and concepts related to telehealth interoperability. It provides clarity and common terminology that stakeholders can reference to ensure consistent understanding and communication across different telehealth projects and implementations.
  2. Technical Guidance: While not prescriptive, ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 offers technical guidance on principles and considerations for achieving interoperability in telehealth systems. This includes discussions on data exchange formats, communication protocols, and integration strategies that stakeholders can apply in their respective telehealth initiatives.
  3. Industry Best Practices: Stakeholders such as healthcare providers, telehealth technology developers, and policymakers can use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to inform best practices in telehealth interoperability. By aligning with recognized standards and recommendations, organizations can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of their telehealth solutions.
  4. Education and Training: ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 serves as educational material for healthcare professionals, IT specialists, and students studying telehealth and health informatics. It aids in understanding the complexities of telehealth interoperability and prepares individuals to implement and support interoperable telehealth systems effectively.
  5. Global Relevance: Although ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 does not have geographic requirements, its principles and definitions are designed to be applicable globally. Organizations and stakeholders worldwide can utilize the TR to foster interoperability in telehealth systems, contributing to global health initiatives and advancements in healthcare delivery.

In summary, while ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 does not mandate specific actions or compliance deadlines, its guidance and definitions are valuable for promoting interoperability in telehealth systems. By referencing and applying the TR’s recommendations, stakeholders can enhance the interoperability, efficiency, and quality of telehealth services provided globally.

CASE STUDY ON ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 PART1: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

Since ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 primarily provides introductory information and definitions rather than specific case studies, there are no documented case studies directly related to this technical report. However, I can outline a hypothetical scenario to illustrate how ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 might be applied in a practical context:

Hypothetical Case Study: Implementing Telehealth Interoperability Standards

Background:
A healthcare network comprising multiple hospitals, clinics, and telehealth service providers aims to enhance their telehealth capabilities and improve interoperability across their systems. They decide to adopt ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to establish a common understanding and framework for telehealth interoperability.

Objectives:

  1. Standardization of Terminology: Use ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to define and standardize terminology related to telehealth interoperability across all healthcare facilities and telehealth platforms within the network.
  2. Integration of Telehealth Systems: Implement guidelines from ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to ensure seamless integration of telehealth systems with existing electronic health record (EHR) systems and other healthcare IT infrastructure.
  3. Enhanced Data Exchange: Improve the efficiency and accuracy of data exchange between telehealth platforms and healthcare providers using the recommended communication protocols and data formats outlined in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004.

Implementation Steps:

  1. Educational Workshops: Conduct workshops and training sessions for healthcare staff and IT teams to familiarize them with the definitions and concepts introduced in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004. This ensures alignment and understanding across all stakeholders.
  2. System Assessment: Perform an assessment of current telehealth systems and identify areas where interoperability standards, as per ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, can be implemented or improved.
  3. Technical Integration: Implement technical solutions such as standardized APIs, data exchange protocols, and security measures based on the recommendations in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to enable seamless interoperability between telehealth platforms and healthcare systems.
  4. Monitoring and Evaluation: Continuously monitor the implementation progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the interoperability measures. Gather feedback from healthcare providers and patients to identify further improvements.

Outcomes:

  • Improved Patient Care: Enhanced interoperability leads to improved access to healthcare services, reduced duplication of efforts, and better continuity of care for patients accessing telehealth services.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlined workflows and standardized practices as per ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 result in operational efficiencies, cost savings, and reduced administrative burden on healthcare providers.
  • Scalability and Future-Proofing: By adopting ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, the healthcare network ensures that its telehealth systems are scalable and adaptable to future technological advancements and regulatory changes.

Conclusion:

While ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 does not have specific case studies documented, this hypothetical scenario demonstrates how healthcare organizations can apply the principles and recommendations from the technical report to enhance telehealth interoperability. Implementing ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can lead to significant improvements in healthcare delivery, patient outcomes, and organizational efficiencies by fostering a standardized approach to telehealth systems integration and operation.

WHITE PAPER ON ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 PART1: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

A white paper on ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 would typically provide a detailed analysis and discussion of the technical report’s content, implications, and applications in the field of telehealth interoperability. Although such a specific white paper may not exist, I can outline what key topics and information might be covered if one were to be created:

White Paper Outline on ISO/TR 16056-1:2004

  1. Introduction to Telehealth Interoperability
  • Overview of telehealth systems and their growing importance in healthcare delivery.
  • Explanation of interoperability and its significance in enhancing telehealth effectiveness and efficiency.
  1. Definitions and Terminology
  • Detailed definitions of key terms related to telehealth interoperability as outlined in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004.
  • Importance of standardized terminology for clear communication and alignment across telehealth stakeholders.
  1. Challenges in Telehealth Interoperability
  • Common challenges faced in achieving interoperability between different telehealth systems and networks.
  • Discussion on technical, organizational, and regulatory hurdles.
  1. Conceptual Framework
  • Overview of the conceptual framework presented in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 for understanding telehealth interoperability.
  • Explanation of the components involved in interoperable telehealth systems.
  1. Benefits of Implementing ISO/TR 16056-1:2004
  • Benefits to healthcare providers, patients, and healthcare systems of adopting interoperability standards.
  • Examples of improved patient care, operational efficiencies, and cost savings.
  1. Guidelines and Recommendations
  • Detailed guidelines and recommendations provided by ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 for achieving telehealth interoperability.
  • Practical steps for implementation and integration into existing healthcare IT infrastructure.
  1. Case Studies and Examples (if available)
  • Real-world examples of organizations or healthcare networks that have successfully implemented ISO/TR 16056-1:2004.
  • Insights into their challenges, strategies, and outcomes.
  1. Future Trends and Considerations
  • Predictions for the future of telehealth interoperability standards and technologies.
  • Considerations for adapting to evolving healthcare landscapes and technological advancements.
  1. Conclusion
  • Summary of key points discussed in the white paper.
  • Call to action for stakeholders to consider adopting ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 to improve telehealth interoperability and healthcare outcomes.

Purpose and Audience:

  • Audience: Healthcare professionals, telehealth technology developers, policymakers, regulatory bodies, and academic researchers interested in understanding and implementing telehealth interoperability standards.
  • Purpose: Educate stakeholders on the importance of telehealth interoperability, provide guidance on implementing ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, and stimulate discussion on improving telehealth systems integration globally.

Such a white paper would serve as a valuable resource for stakeholders looking to deepen their understanding of telehealth interoperability standards and their practical applications in healthcare settings. It would provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with adopting ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, ultimately promoting the advancement of interoperable telehealth solutions.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION OF ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 PART1: INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, which focuses on the introduction and definitions related to the interoperability of telehealth systems and networks, primarily serves as a foundational document rather than one with direct industrial applications. However, its principles and definitions can certainly influence and guide industrial practices in the development, implementation, and regulation of telehealth technologies. Here are some ways in which ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 can be relevant to industrial applications:

Adoption and Implementation by Telehealth Technology Providers:

  1. Standardization of Terminology and Concepts:
  • Benefit: Telehealth technology developers can align their products with standardized terminology and concepts defined in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004. This promotes clarity and consistency in communication and integration between different telehealth systems.
  • Application: Companies developing telehealth platforms and devices can use the definitions provided to ensure their systems are interoperable with other healthcare IT systems, enhancing market acceptance and usability.
  1. Guidance for System Integration:
  • Benefit: ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 offers guidance on technical considerations and interoperability requirements for integrating telehealth systems with existing healthcare infrastructures, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and hospital information systems (HIS).
  • Application: Telehealth technology providers can use the guidelines to design interfaces, communication protocols, and data exchange formats that facilitate seamless integration and data sharing across different healthcare settings.

Impact on Healthcare Providers:

  1. Improved Operational Efficiency:
  • Benefit: Healthcare providers can benefit from streamlined workflows and reduced administrative burden through interoperable telehealth systems.
  • Application: Implementing ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 recommendations can help healthcare organizations optimize resource allocation, improve patient scheduling, and enhance overall efficiency in delivering telehealth services.
  1. Enhanced Patient Care and Safety:
  • Benefit: Standardized interoperability practices can lead to better coordinated care, improved clinical decision-making, and enhanced patient safety.
  • Application: Healthcare providers can leverage interoperable telehealth systems to access comprehensive patient information, share data securely across platforms, and ensure continuity of care, especially in remote or rural healthcare settings.

Regulatory and Policy Considerations:

  1. Influence on Telehealth Regulations:
  • Benefit: ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 definitions and principles can inform the development of telehealth regulations and policies by regulatory authorities.
  • Application: Policymakers can reference the TR to establish interoperability requirements, data privacy standards, and cybersecurity measures for telehealth systems, ensuring compliance and patient protection.

Educational and Training Initiatives:

  1. Professional Development and Training:
  • Benefit: Healthcare professionals and IT staff can benefit from training programs that incorporate ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 concepts and guidelines.
  • Application: Educational institutions and training providers can use the TR to develop curriculum modules and certification programs focused on telehealth interoperability, preparing professionals to implement and support interoperable telehealth solutions effectively.

Conclusion:

While ISO/TR 16056-1:2004 Part 1 does not directly provide case studies or industrial applications, its definitions and introductory framework play a crucial role in shaping industrial practices and standards related to telehealth interoperability. By adopting and implementing the principles outlined in ISO/TR 16056-1:2004, industrial stakeholders can contribute to the advancement of interoperable telehealth systems, ultimately improving healthcare delivery, patient outcomes, and operational efficiency across the healthcare industry.

  1. “What is TeleHealth?”. Office for the Advancement of Telehealth. The Health Resources and Services Administration. March 2022. Retrieved 12 January 2024.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Shaw DK (June 2009). “Overview of telehealth and its application to cardiopulmonary physical therapy”. Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal. 20 (2): 13–8. doi:10.1097/01823246-200920020-00003. PMC 2845264. PMID 20467533.
  3. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Masson M (December 2014). “Benefits of TED Talks”. Canadian Family Physician. 60 (12): 1080. PMC 4264800. PMID 25500595.
  4. ^ Mashima PA, Doarn CR (December 2008). “Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 14 (10): 1101–17. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0080. PMID 19119834.
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b Miller EA (July 2007). “Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century”. Health Policy. 82 (2): 133–41. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.011. PMID 17046097.
  6. ^ Mitchell B (2015-07-01). “Teladoc shares surge 50% in healthy IPO debut”. USA Today. Retrieved 2015-07-02.
  7. ^ “2010 Opportunities and developments | Report on the second global survey on eHealth | Global Observatory for eHealth series – Volume 2: TELEMEDICINE” (PDF). 13 January 2011. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  8. ^ Jump up to:a b c “What is Telemedicine?”. Washington, D.C.: American Telemedicine Association. Archived from the original on 8 May 2013. Retrieved 21 August 2011.
  9. ^ Della Mea V (2001). “What is e-Health (2): The death of telemedicine?”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 3 (2): e22. doi:10.2196/jmir.3.2.e22
  10. ^ Alexandrov AW, Alexandrov AV (April 2020). “Innovations in Prehospital Stroke Management Utilizing Mobile Stroke Units”. Continuum. 26 (2). Minneapolis, Minn.: 506–512. doi:10.1212/CON.0000000000000850. PMID 32224764. S2CID 214732273.
  11. ^ Itrat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, Briggs F, Cho SM, Organek N, et al. (February 2016). “Telemedicine in Prehospital Stroke Evaluation and Thrombolysis: Taking Stroke Treatment to the Doorstep”. JAMA Neurology. 73 (2): 162–8. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3849. PMID 26641366.
  12. ^ Audebert H, Fassbender K, Hussain MS, Ebinger M, Turc G, Uchino K, et al. (PRESTO Group) (December 2017). “The PRE-hospital Stroke Treatment Organization”. International Journal of Stroke. 12 (9): 932–940. doi:10.1177/1747493017729268. PMID 28872449.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c “What is Telehealth?”. The Center for Connected Health Policy. Archived from the original on January 15, 2012.
  14. ^ Jump up to:a b c Sachpazidis I (10 Jul 2008). Image and Medical Data Communication Protocols for Telemedicine and Teleradiology (dissertation) (PDF) (Thesis). Darmstadt, Germany: Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt. Retrieved 14 Aug 2018.
  15. ^ Salehahmadi Z, Hajialiasghari F (January 2013). “Telemedicine in iran: chances and challenges”. World Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2 (1): 18–25. PMC 4238336. PMID 25489500.
  16. ^ Pierratos A (November 1999). “Nocturnal hemodialysis: dialysis for the new millennium”. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 161 (9): 1137. PMC 1230743. PMID 10569098.
  17. ^ Koutras C, Bitsaki M, Koutras G, Nikolaou C, Heep H (17 August 2015). “Socioeconomic impact of e-Health services in major joint replacement: A scoping review”. Technology and Health Care. 23 (6): 809–17. doi:10.3233/THC-151036. PMID 26409523.
  18. ^ Fatehi F, Armfield NR, Dimitrijevic M, Gray LC (October 2014). “Clinical applications of videoconferencing: a scoping review of the literature for the period 2002-2012”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 20 (7): 377–83. doi:10.1177/1357633X14552385. PMID 25399998. S2CID 39080490.
  19. ^ McGraw-Hill Concise Encyclopedia of Engineering. Videotelephony, McGraw-Hill, 2002. Retrieved from the FreeDictionary.com website, January 9, 2010
  20. ^ George R. Schwartz, C. Gene Cayten; George R. Schwartz (editor). Principles and Practice of Emergency Medicine, Volume 2, Lea & Febiger, 1992, pg.3202, ISBN 0-8121-1373-X, ISBN 978-0-8121-1373-0.
  21. ^ Rogove HJ, McArthur D, Demaerschalk BM, Vespa PM (January–February 2012). “Barriers to telemedicine: survey of current users in acute care units”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 18 (1): 48–53. doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0071. PMID 22082107.
  22. ^ Langabeer JR, Champagne-Langabeer T, Alqusairi D, Kim J, Jackson A, Persse D, et al. (September 2017). “Cost-benefit analysis of telehealth in pre-hospital care”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 23 (8): 747–751. doi:10.1177/1357633X16680541. PMID 27913657. S2CID 26707384.
  23. ^ “Nurses Happier Using Telecare, Says International Survey”. eHealth Insider. 15 June 2005. Archived from the original on 18 June 2006. Retrieved 4 April 2009.
  24. ^ “Google Glass connects breastfeeding moms with lactation help”. Inquisitr. 24 April 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  25. ^ Social SW (25 February 2014). “Breastfeeding Walkthrough for Mothers and Counselors” – via Vimeo.
  26. ^ “Exclusive Clips Google glasses help breastfeeding mums”. Jumpin Today Show. Mi9 Pty. Ltd. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  27. ^ “Breastfeeding mothers get help from Google Glass and Small World”. The Sydney Morning Herald.
  28. ^ “Turns Out Google Glass Is Good for Breastfeeding”. Motherboard Vice Media Inc. 21 April 2014. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  29. ^ “SWS Website – We transfer complex and tacit knowledge”. SWS Website.
  30. ^ “Breastfeeding Support Project – Small World Social”. 23 April 2014. Archived from the original on 2014-04-23.
  31. ^ Finucane AM, O’Donnell H, Lugton J, Gibson-Watt T, Swenson C, Pagliari C (2021-04-06). “Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review”. npj Digital Medicine. 4 (1): 64. doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00430-7. ISSN 2398-6352. PMC 8024379. PMID 33824407.
  32. ^ Chen Y, Qiao C, Zhang X, Li W, Yang H (2022-09-14). “The Effect of Tele-palliative Care on Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review”. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 40 (8): 907–925. doi:10.1177/10499091221123566. ISSN 1049-9091. PMID 36113129. S2CID 252287978.
  33. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Lundereng ED, Nes AA, Holmen H, Winger A, Thygesen H, Jøranson N, et al. (2023-03-29). “Health Care Professionals’ Experiences and Perspectives on Using Telehealth for Home-based Palliative Care: Scoping Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25 (1): e43429. doi:10.2196/43429. PMC 10131609. PMID 36989024.
  34. ^ Jump up to:a b Steindal SA, Nes AA, Godskesen TE, Dihle A, Lind S, Winger A, et al. (2020-05-05). “Patients’ Experiences of Telehealth in Palliative Home Care: Scoping Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22 (5): e16218. doi:10.2196/16218. PMC 7238080. PMID 32369037.
  35. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Steindal SA, Nes AA, Godskesen TE, Holmen H, Winger A, Österlind J, et al. (2023-03-13). “Advantages and Challenges of Using Telehealth for Home-Based Palliative Care: Systematic Mixed Studies Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25 (1): e43684. doi:10.2196/43684. PMC 10131904. PMID 36912876.
  36. ^ “What Are Palliative Care and Hospice Care?”. National Institute on Aging. 14 May 2021. Retrieved 2023-04-27.
  37. ^ Head BA, Schapmire TJ, Zheng Y (April 2017). “Telehealth in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes”. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing. 19 (2): 130. doi:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000319. ISSN 1522-2179. S2CID 78763088.
  38. ^ Poudel A, Nissen LM (2016-10-26). “Telepharmacy: a pharmacist’s perspective on the clinical benefits and challenges”. Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice. 5: 75–82. doi:10.2147/IPRP.S101685. PMC 5741040. PMID 29354542.
  39. ^ Lowry SJ, Kay CN, Marsom EN, Park JS, Poole S, Page AT (2020). “Optimising health outcomes via pharmacist delivered telehealth medicines management: a systematic review”. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 50 (5). Wiley: 377–390. doi:10.1002/jppr.1695. ISSN 1445-937X. S2CID 225070505.
  40. ^ Jump up to:a b Angaran DM (July 1999). “Telemedicine and telepharmacy: current status and future implications”. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 56 (14): 1405–26. doi:10.1093/ajhp/56.14.1405. PMID 10428449.
  41. ^ “What is Telepsychiatry?”. American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved 2023-02-20.
  42. ^ “What is Telemental Health?”. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Retrieved 2023-02-20.
  43. ^ Jump up to:a b Schlief M, Saunders KR, Appleton R, Barnett P, Vera San Juan N, Foye U, et al. (2022-09-29). “Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review”. Interactive Journal of Medical Research. 11 (2): e38239. doi:10.2196/38239. ISSN 1929-073X. PMC 9524537. PMID 35767691.
  44. ^ Schuster R, Fischer E, Jansen C, Napravnik N, Rockinger S, Steger N, et al. (2022). “Blending Internet-based and tele group treatment: Acceptability, effects, and mechanisms of change of cognitive behavioral treatment for depression”. Internet Interventions. 29. doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100551. PMC 9204733. PMID 35722084.
  45. ^ Appleton R, Williams J, Vera San Juan N, Needle JJ, Schlief M, Jordan H, et al. (2021-12-09). “Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23 (12): e31746. doi:10.2196/31746. ISSN 1438-8871. PMC 8664153. PMID 34709179.
  46. ^ Givens GD, Elangovan S (December 2003). “Internet application to tele-audiology–“nothin’ but net””. American Journal of Audiology. 12 (2): 59–65. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2003/011). ISSN 1059-0889. PMID 14964319.
  47. ^ Jump up to:a b c Dorsey ER, Glidden AM, Holloway MR, Birbeck GL, Schwamm LH (May 2018). “Teleneurology and mobile technologies: the future of neurological care”. Nature Reviews. Neurology. 14 (5): 285–297. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.31. PMID 29623949. S2CID 4620042.
  48. ^ Jump up to:a b Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Schmidt PN, et al. (September 2017). “National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease”. Neurology. 89 (11): 1152–1161. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. PMC 5595275. PMID 28814455.
  49. ^ Jump up to:a b Ben-Pazi H, Browne P, Chan P, Cubo E, Guttman M, Hassan A, et al. (April 2018). “The Promise of Telemedicine for Movement Disorders: an Interdisciplinary Approach”. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 18 (5): 26. doi:10.1007/s11910-018-0834-6. PMID 29654523. S2CID 4850577.
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b c Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Schmidt PN, et al. (September 2017). “National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease”. Neurology. 89 (11): 1152–1161. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. PMC 5595275. PMID 28814455.
  51. ^ Appelboom G, Yang AH, Christophe BR, Bruce EM, Slomian J, Bruyère O, et al. (July 2014). “The promise of wearable activity sensors to define patient recovery”. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 21 (7): 1089–1093. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.12.003. PMID 24534628. S2CID 2543446.
  52. ^ Lazarus G, Permana AP, Nugroho SW, Audrey J, Wijaya DN, Widyahening IS (October 2020). “Telestroke strategies to enhance acute stroke management in rural settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Brain and Behavior. 10 (10): e01787. doi:10.1002/brb3.1787. PMC 7559631. PMID 32812380.
  53. ^ Chalouhi N, Dressler JA, Kunkel ES, Dalyai R, Jabbour P, Gonzalez LF, et al. (October 2013). “Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator administration in community hospitals facilitated by telestroke service”. Neurosurgery. 73 (4): 667–71, discussion 671–2. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000073. PMID 23842556.
  54. ^ Mouchtouris N, Yu S, Prashant G, Nelson N, Reyes M, Gonzalez G, et al. (July 2022). “Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Where We Are 1 Year Later”. World Neurosurgery. 163: e83 – e88. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.037. PMC 8925084. PMID 35306198.
  55. ^ Mouchtouris N, Lavergne P, Montenegro TS, Gonzalez G, Baldassari M, Sharan A, et al. (August 2020). “Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned and Transformation of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. World Neurosurgery. 140: e387 – e394. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.251. PMC 7274123. PMID 32512241.
  56. ^ Wadsworth HE, Dhima K, Womack KB, Hart J, Weiner MF, Hynan LS, et al. (December 2018). “Validity of Teleneuropsychological Assessment in Older Patients with Cognitive Disorders”. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 33 (8): 1040–1045. doi:10.1093/arclin/acx140. PMC 6887729. PMID 29329363.
  57. ^ Wadsworth HE, Galusha-Glasscock JM, Womack KB, Quiceno M, Weiner MF, Hynan LS, et al. (August 2016). “Remote Neuropsychological Assessment in Rural American Indians with and without Cognitive Impairment”. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 31 (5): 420–425. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw030. PMC 4954610. PMID 27246957.
  58. ^ Galusha-Glasscock JM, Horton DK, Weiner MF, Cullum CM (February 2016). “Video Teleconference Administration of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status”. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 31 (1): 8–11. doi:10.1093/arclin/acv058. PMC 4718188. PMID 26446834.
  59. ^ Parikh M, Grosch MC, Graham LL, Hynan LS, Weiner M, Shore JH, et al. (2013). “Consumer acceptability of brief videoconference-based neuropsychological assessment in older individuals with and without cognitive impairment”. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 27 (5): 808–817. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.791723. PMC 3692573. PMID 23607729.
  60. ^ Grosch MC, Gottlieb MC, Cullum CM (October 2011). “Initial practice recommendations for teleneuropsychology”. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 25 (7): 1119–1133. doi:10.1080/13854046.2011.609840. PMID 21951075. S2CID 29638722.
  61. ^ Munro Cullum C, Hynan LS, Grosch M, Parikh M, Weiner MF (November 2014). “Teleneuropsychology: evidence for video teleconference-based neuropsychological assessment”. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 20 (10): 1028–1033. doi:10.1017/S1355617714000873. PMC 4410096. PMID 25343269.
  62. ^ “Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, delivered as supported self-help, can help people with depression”. NIHR Evidence. 11 October 2023. doi:10.3310/nihrevidence_59926. S2CID 264068810.
  63. ^ Costantino A, Roncoroni L, Noviello D, Nandi N, Lombardo V, Scricciolo A, Scaramella L, Vecchi M, Elli L. Nutritional and Gastroenterological Monitoring of Patients With Celiac Disease During COVID-19 Pandemic: The Emerging Role of Telemedicine and Point-of-Care Gluten Detection Tests. Front Nutr. 2021 Apr 13;8:622514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.622514
  64. ^ E-health care information systems: an introduction for students and professionals. John Wiley and Sons. 2005. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-7879-6618-8.
  65. ^ Keaton L, Pierce LL, Steiner V, Lance K (October 2004). “An E-rehabilitation Team Helps Caregivers Deal with Stroke”. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2 (4). Ijahsp.nova.edu. ISSN 1540-580X. Retrieved 26 March 2011.
  66. ^ Raymond MJ, Christie LJ, Kramer S, Malaguti C, Mok Z, Gardner B, et al. (2024-02-07). “Delivery of Allied Health Interventions Using Telehealth Modalities: A Rapid Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Healthcare. 12 (12): 1217. doi:10.3390/healthcare12121217. ISSN 2227-9032. PMC 11203162. PMID 38921331.
  67. ^ “OSERS”. www.ed.gov. Archived from the original on 2003-10-11.
  68. ^ Hiers M (17 June 2014). “Everything You Need to Know About Telemedicine”. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
  69. ^ Palsbo SE (July 2004). “Medicaid payment for telerehabilitation”. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 85 (7): 1188–1191. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.008. PMID 15241772.
  70. ^ Collins H (28 August 2008). “Advanced First Responder and Medical Capabilities Could Save Lives”. Emergency Management. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
  71. ^ “Advanced technologies and wireless telecommunications enhance care and medical training at the Ryder Trauma Center in Miami”. Virtual Medical Worlds. 4 December 2008. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  72. ^ “EMS Trauma Grand Rounds”. Utah Telehealth Network. Archived from the original on 16 September 2009. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  73. ^ Gonzalez D (10 November 2011). “UM Doctors Use Telemedicine to Continue Care In Iraq”. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  74. ^ Telecardiology.
  75. ^ General health care delivery. Remotely treating ventricular fibrillation. Medphone Corporation, 1989
  76. ^ Shanker A, Makhija S, Mantri PK (1982). “Teletransmission of ECG Waveform: An Ingenious Low Priced Technique”. Indian Heart Journal. 34 (6).
  77. ^ “Electronic Government Directorate | Pakistan telemedicine”. Archived from the original on 2011-07-04. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  78. ^ Sanders D, Ungar L, Eskander MA, Seto AH (July 2019). “Ambulatory ECG monitoring in the age of smartphones”. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 86 (7): 483–493. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18123. PMID 31291182. S2CID 195811584.
  79. ^ Kontaxakis G, Visvikis D, Ohl R, Sachpazidis I, Suarez JP, Selby P, et al. (2006). “Integrated telemedicine applications and services for oncological positron emission tomography”. Oncology Reports. 15 (4): 1091–1100. doi:10.3892/or.15.4.1091. PMID 16525707.
  80. ^ Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, Barker GP, Krupinski EA, Lopez AM, et al. (August 2009). “Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future”. Human Pathology. 40 (8): 1057–1069. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006. PMID 19552937.
  81. ^ Kumar S (2009). “Telepathology: An Audit”. In Kumar S, Dunn BE (eds.). Telepathology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 225–229. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85786-0_16. ISBN 978-3-540-85785-3.
  82. ^ Weinstein RS (May 1986). “Prospects for telepathology”. Human Pathology. 17 (5): 433–434. doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(86)80028-4. PMID 3516858.
  83. ^ Weinstein RS, Bloom KJ, Rozek LS (July 1987). “Telepathology and the networking of pathology diagnostic services”. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 111 (7): 646–652. PMID 3606341.
  84. ^ Kayser K, Szymas J, Weinstein RS (1999). Telepathology: Telecommunications, Electronic Education and Publication in Pathology. Springer, NY. pp. 1–186.
  85. ^ “ReUnion ’10 award winners”. Union College. Archived from the original on 5 August 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2013.
  86. ^ Nordrum I, Engum B, Rinde E, Finseth A, Ericsson H, Kearney M, et al. (June 1991). “Remote frozen section service: a telepathology project in northern Norway”. Human Pathology. 22 (6): 514–518. doi:10.1016/0046-8177(91)90226-F. PMID 1864583.
  87. ^ “Online Visits With Dermatologists Enhance Access to Care for Patients With Minor and Serious Skin Conditions, Boost Physician Productivity”. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2013-11-06. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  88. ^ Ford AR, Gibbons CM, Torres J, Kornmehl HA, Singh S, Young PM, et al. (July 2019). “Access to Dermatological Care with an Innovative Online Model for Psoriasis Management: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 25 (7): 619–627. doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.0160. PMC 6417973. PMID 30222518.
  89. ^ Wootton R, Batch J (2005). Telepediatrics: telemedicine and child health. Royal Society of Medicine. ISBN 978-1-85315-645-8.[page needed]
  90. ^ Wurm EM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Wurm R, Soyer HP (February 2008). “Telemedicine and teledermatology: Past, present and future”. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 6 (2): 106–112. doi:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06440.x. PMID 18005076. S2CID 41450493.
  91. ^ Burg G, Hasse U, Cipolat C, Kropf R, Djamei V, Soyer HP, et al. (2005). “Teledermatology: just cool or a real tool?”. Dermatology. 210 (2): 169–173. doi:10.1159/000082573. PMID 15724100. S2CID 36135198.
  92. ^ Perednia DA, Brown NA (January 1995). “Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine”. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 83 (1): 42–47. PMC 225996. PMID 7703938.
  93. ^ “Telemedicine-Based Eye Examinations Enhance Access, Reduce Costs, and Increase Satisfaction for Low-Income and Minority Patients with Diabetes”. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2013-07-17. Retrieved 24 July 2013.
  94. ^ “Remote Retinal Screening Facilitates Diagnosis and Treatment of Retinopathy for Poor and/or Uninsured Patients With Diabetes in Rural California”. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2012-10-03. Retrieved 24 July 2013.
  95. ^ Phukan R, Mehta MR, Gogia S (2014-11-02). “Results and Problems in Executing Teleophthalmology”. Indian Journal of Medical Informatics. 8 (2): 32–33.
  96. ^ “Telehealth company sues Indiana for ban on online eye exams”. TimesUnion.com. 21 April 2019.
  97. ^ “IST’s Media Collection”. Interface Surgical Technologies.
  98. ^ Jump up to:a b c Endler M, Lavelanet A, Cleeve A, Ganatra B, Gomperts R, Gemzell-Danielsson K (August 2019). “Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review”. BJOG. 126 (9): 1094–1102. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15684. PMC 7496179. PMID 30869829.
  99. ^ “Study: Taking abortion pill at home as safe as in a clinic”. NBC News. 17 May 2017. Retrieved 2020-05-18.
  100. ^ Jump up to:a b “Improving Access to Abortion via Telehealth”. Guttmacher Institute. 2019-05-07. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  101. ^ “Telabortion Project”. Retrieved April 26, 2020.
  102. ^ Jump up to:a b Belluck P (28 April 2020). “Abortion by Telemedicine: A Growing Option as Access to Clinics Wanes”. The New York Times. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  103. ^ “Home – Telabortion”. telabortion.org. Retrieved 2020-05-11.
  104. ^ Jones RK, Jerman J (March 2017). “Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014”. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 49 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1363/2019.30760. PMC 5487028. PMID 28094905.
  105. ^ “Medication Abortion and Telemedicine: Innovations and Barriers During the COVID-19 Emergency”. KFF. 2020-06-08. Retrieved 2020-08-03.
  106. ^ “Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care”. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Retrieved 2020-08-03.
  107. ^ Arora S, Thornton K, Murata G, Deming P, Kalishman S, Dion D, et al. (June 2011). “Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 364 (23): 2199–2207. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009370. PMC 3820419. PMID 21631316.
  108. ^ Sun Y, Li Y, Wang J, Chen Q, Bazzano AN, Cao F (2021-01-27). “Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Training on Maternal Perinatal Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23 (1): e23410. doi:10.2196/23410. PMC 7875700. PMID 33502326.
  109. ^ “Healthcare Workers”. 11 February 2020.
  110. ^ Sezgin E, Huang Y, Lin D, Ramtekkar U, Pauline L, Lin S (2021-10-01). “Documented Reasons of Cancellation and Rescheduling of Telehealth Appointments During the Pandemic”. Telemedicine and e-Health. 27 (10): 1143–1150. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0454. ISSN 1530-5627. PMID 33373553. S2CID 229721870.
  111. ^ Louis S, Isaacson JH, Yepes-Rios M, Mehta N (April 2020). “Designing Virtual Medical Student Ambulatory Rotations in Light of the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Pilot Project”. EdArXiv. doi:10.35542/osf.io/9urcd. S2CID 243221925.
  112. ^ Murphy B (17 September 2020). “How Medical Students are Innovating During COVID-19”. American Medical Association.
  113. ^ “Information on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT)”. SAMHSA. 21 July 2015.
  114. ^ “Use of Telephone Evaluations to Initiate Buprenorphine Prescribing” (PDF). DEA Information Page.
  115. ^ Jane (2020-07-21). “I am Addicted to Opioids and in my Desperation I Turned to the Internet — Here is What happened”. Medium. Retrieved 2020-07-22.
  116. ^ Alharthi MS (2012). Telehealth Practice in Eight Countries: New Zealand, Australia, the USA, Canada, UK, Malaysia, China and India (Masters in Information Science thesis). Massey University, Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.
  117. ^ Jump up to:a b García-Rojo M (2016). “International Clinical Guidelines for the Adoption of Digital Pathology: A Review of Technical Aspects”. Pathobiology. 83 (2–3): 99–109. doi:10.1159/000441192. PMID 27100834.
  118. ^ “Statement on telehealth” (PDF). Medical Council of New Zealand. 2013.
  119. ^ Lucas J (2013). Clinicians’ perceptions of telemedicine: Opportunities and barriers for emergency medicine • Health Improvement and Innovation Resource Centre (Masters (Nursing) thesis). University of Auckland. Archived from the original on 2018-12-04. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
  120. ^ Jump up to:a b Bazzano AN, Patel T, Nauman E, Cernigliaro D, Shi L (2024-01-01). “Optimizing Telehealth for Diabetes Management in the Deep South of the United States: Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators on the Patient and Clinician Journey”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 26 (1): e43583. doi:10.2196/43583. PMC 10790202. PMID 37976468.
  121. ^ “Transportation to Support Rural Healthcare Overview – Rural Health Information Hub”. www.ruralhealthinfo.org. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  122. ^ “Healthcare Access in Rural Communities Overview – Rural Health Information Hub”. www.ruralhealthinfo.org. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  123. ^ Possemato K, Bishop TM, Willis MA, Lantinga LJ (October 2013). “Healthcare utilization and symptom variation among veterans using Behavioral Telehealth Center services”. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 40 (4): 416–26. doi:10.1007/s11414-013-9338-y. PMID 23616251. S2CID 33937086.
  124. ^ Darkins A, Foster L, Anderson C, Goldschmidt L, Selvin G (July 2013). “The design, implementation, and operational management of a comprehensive quality management program to support national telehealth networks”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 19 (7): 557–64. doi:10.1089/tmj.2012.0263. PMID 23705961.
  125. ^ “Telehealth and Health Information Technology in Rural Healthcare Overview – Rural Health Information Hub”. www.ruralhealthinfo.org. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  126. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Maheu M, Whitten P, Allen A (2002-02-28). E-Health, Telehealth, and Telemedicine: A Guide to Startup and Success. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-7879-5903-6.
  127. ^ Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, Mansour O, Qato DM, Stafford RS (October 2020). “Use and Content of Primary Care Office-Based vs Telemedicine Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US”. JAMA Network Open. 3 (10): e2021476. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21476. PMC 7532385. PMID 33006622.
  128. ^ “Telemedicine is here to stay”. Building Better Healthcare. 11 August 2021. Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  129. ^ “Prime Minister says GPs should see patients face to face”. Pulse. 21 September 2021. Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  130. ^ Jump up to:a b Vockley M (2015-10-01). “The Rise of Telehealth: ‘Triple Aim,’ Innovative Technology, and Popular Demand Are Spearheading New Models of Health and Wellness Care”. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology. 49 (5): 306–20. doi:10.2345/0899-8205-49.5.306. PMID 26443907.
  131. ^ Jump up to:a b Kvedar J, Coye MJ, Everett W (February 2014). “Connected health: a review of technologies and strategies to improve patient care with telemedicine and telehealth”. Health Affairs. 33 (2): 194–9. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0992. PMID 24493760.
  132. ^ Jump up to:a b c Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Cartwright M, Cleanthous S, Selva A, et al. (May 2017). “Quantifying beliefs regarding telehealth: Development of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire” (PDF). Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 23 (4): 460–469. doi:10.1177/1357633X16649531. PMID 27224997. S2CID 206705202.
  133. ^ Cantor AG, Jungbauer RM, Totten AM, Tilden EL, Holmes R, Ahmed A, et al. (September 2022). “Telehealth Strategies for the Delivery of Maternal Health Care : A Rapid Review”. Annals of Internal Medicine. 175 (9): 1285–1297. doi:10.7326/M22-0737. PMID 35878405. S2CID 251067668.
  134. ^ Richard Payerchin (January 20, 2023). “Telemedicine better than expected for consulting on surgeries”. Medical Economics.
  135. ^ “Ryan Haight Act will Require Tighter Restrictions on Internet Pharmacies”. www.govtech.com. 27 July 2010. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
  136. ^ Jump up to:a b c “Telemedicine sanction in Idaho clouds doctor’s future”. Spokesman.com. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
  137. ^ “Teladoc case against Texas Medical Board will move forward, judge rules”. Modern Healthcare. 14 December 2015. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
  138. ^ Jump up to:a b c Myers K, Turvey C, eds. (2012-09-20). Telemental Health: Clinical, Technical, and Administrative Foundations for Evidence-Based Practice (1 ed.). Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-416048-4.
  139. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Umefjord G (2006-01-01). Internet consultation in medicine: studies of a text-based Ask the doctor service (Ph.D. thesis). Umeå University).
  140. ^ Kahn JM (April 2015). “Virtual visits–confronting the challenges of telemedicine”. The New England Journal of Medicine. 372 (18): 1684–1685. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500533. PMID 25923547.
  141. ^ Goggin G (2006-01-01). Cell Phone Culture: Mobile Technology in Everyday Life. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-36743-1.
  142. ^ Bloomsbury.com. “mHealth in Practice”. Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  143. ^ Ben-Zeev D, Brian RM, Jonathan G, Razzano L, Pashka N, Carpenter-Song E, et al. (September 2018). “Mobile Health (mHealth) Versus Clinic-Based Group Intervention for People With Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Psychiatric Services. 69 (9): 978–985. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201800063. PMID 29793397.
  144. ^ Hardinge M, Rutter H, Velardo C, Shah SA, Williams V, Tarassenko L, et al. (June 2015). “Using a mobile health application to support self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a six-month cohort study”. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 15 (1): 46. doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0171-5. PMC 4472616. PMID 26084626.
  145. ^ Dall’Ora C, Griffiths P, Hope J, Briggs J, Jeremy J, Gerry S, et al. (June 2021). “How long do nursing staff take to measure and record patients’ vital signs observations in hospital? A time-and-motion study”. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 118: 103921. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103921. PMC 8249906. PMID 33812297.
  146. ^ “Facts and Figures 2021: 2.9 billion people still offline”. ITU Hub. 2021-11-29. Retrieved 2022-05-10.
  147. ^ “Google Glass can help you breastfeed”. HLN Staff. 2014.
  148. ^ “Breastfeeding and Google Glass application trial”. The Australian Breastfeeding Association. 2016. Archived from the original on 2019-04-10. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  149. ^ Jump up to:a b “Breastfeeding Support Program Through Google Glass”. Small World. 2015.
  150. ^ “WHO | Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding”. www.who.int. Archived from the original on January 16, 2012. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  151. ^ Jump up to:a b Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. (January 2016). “Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect”. Lancet. 387 (10017): 475–490. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. hdl:10072/413175. PMID 26869575.
  152. ^ Albritton J, Ortiz A, Wines R, Booth G, DiBello M, Brown S, et al. (February 2022). “Video Teleconferencing for Disease Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment : A Rapid Review”. Annals of Internal Medicine. 175 (2): 256–266. doi:10.7326/m21-3511. PMID 34871056. S2CID 244923066.
  153. ^ Novak M. “Telemedicine Predicted in 1925”. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  154. ^ Jump up to:a b Gillman-Wells CC, Sankar TK, Vadodaria S (February 2021). “COVID-19 Reducing the Risks: Telemedicine is the New Norm for Surgical Consultations and Communications”. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 45 (1): 343–348. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01907-8. PMC 7471549. PMID 32885319.
  155. ^ Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A (August 2020). “The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence”. BMC Public Health. 20 (1): 1193. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4. PMC 7395209. PMID 32738884.
  156. ^ Jump up to:a b “Telehealth Key to Maintaining Access to Addiction Recovery”. www.aafp.org. Retrieved 27 January 2022.
  157. ^ Jump up to:a b Portnoy J, Waller M, Elliott T (May 2020). “Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19”. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. In Practice. 8 (5): 1489–1491. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.008. PMC 7104202. PMID 32220575.
  158. ^ “Benefits of Telemedicine”. www.hopkinsmedicine.org. 18 January 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  159. ^ Molfenter T, Boyle M, Holloway D, Zwick J (May 2015). “Trends in telemedicine use in addiction treatment”. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice. 10 (1): 14. doi:10.1186/s13722-015-0035-4. PMC 4636787. PMID 26016484.
  160. ^ Hyder MA, Razzak J (November 2020). “Telemedicine in the United States: An Introduction for Students and Residents”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22 (11): e20839. doi:10.2196/20839. PMC 7690251. PMID 33215999.
  161. ^ Jump up to:a b Bardsley M, Steventon A, Doll H (October 2013). “Impact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial”. BMC Health Services Research. 13: 395. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-395. PMC 3852608. PMID 24099334.
  162. ^ Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Doll H, Bower P, et al. (February 2013). “Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial”. BMJ. 346: f653. doi:10.1136/bmj.f653. PMC 3582704. PMID 23444424.
  163. ^ Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, et al. (July 2012). “Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study”. BMC Health Services Research. 12: 220. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220. PMC 3413558. PMID 22834978.
  164. ^ Eddison N, Leone E, Healy A, Royse C, Chockalingam N (June 2022). “The potential impact of allied health professional telehealth consultations on health inequities and the burden of treatment”. International Journal for Equity in Health. 21 (1): 91. doi:10.1186/s12939-022-01689-2. PMC 9245876. PMID 35773695.
  165. ^ Waller M, Stotler C (August 2018). “Telemedicine: a Primer”. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports. 18 (10): 54. doi:10.1007/s11882-018-0808-4. PMID 30145709. S2CID 52089750.
  166. ^ Costantino, A., Caprioli, F., Elli, L., Roncoroni, L., Stocco, D., Doneda, L., … & Vecchi, M. (2022). Determinants of patient trust in gastroenterology televisits: Results of machine learning analysis. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 29, 100867.
  167. ^ Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M (January 2018). “Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 24 (1): 4–12. doi:10.1177/1357633X16674087. PMC 5768250. PMID 29320966.
  168. ^ Jump up to:a b Iyengar K, Jain VK, Vaishya R (1 September 2020). “Pitfalls in telemedicine consultations in the era of COVID 19 and how to avoid them”. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. 14 (5): 797–799. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.007. PMC 7280804. PMID 32534432.
  169. ^ Snoswell C, Smith AC, Scuffham PA, Whitty JA (October 2017). “Economic evaluation strategies in telehealth: Obtaining a more holistic valuation of telehealth interventions”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 23 (9): 792–796. doi:10.1177/1357633×16671407. PMID 27789615. S2CID 25527349.
  170. ^ Snoswell CL, Whitty JA, Caffery LJ, Loescher LJ, Gillespie N, Janda M (December 2018). “Direct-to-consumer mobile teledermoscopy for skin cancer screening: Preliminary results demonstrating willingness-to-pay in Australia”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 24 (10): 683–689. doi:10.1177/1357633×18799582. PMID 30343653.
  171. ^ Snoswell CL, Caffery LJ, Whitty JA, Soyer HP, Gordon LG (June 2018). “Cost-effectiveness of Skin Cancer Referral and Consultation Using Teledermoscopy in Australia”. JAMA Dermatology. 154 (6): 694–700. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0855. PMC 6145645. PMID 29801161.
  172. ^ Snoswell CL, Whitty JA, Caffery LJ, Finnane A, Soyer HP (August 2019). “What do Australian dermatologists expect to be paid for store-and-forward teledermoscopy? A preliminary investigation” (PDF). Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 25 (7): 438–444. doi:10.1177/1357633×18776766. PMID 29933722. S2CID 49389361.
  173. ^ Chausiaux O, Hayes J, Long C, Morris S, Williams G, Husheer S (2011). “Pregnancy Prognosis in Infertile Couples on the DuoFertility Programme Compared with In Vitro Fertilisation/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection”. European Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 6 (2): 92–94.
  174. ^ “Telehealth Improves Access and Quality of Care for Alaska Natives”. The Innovations Exchange Team. 2013.
  175. ^ Gega L, Jankovic D, Saramago P, Marshall D, Dawson S, Brabyn S, et al. (January 2022). “Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling”. Health Technology Assessment. 26 (1). National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR): 1–182. doi:10.3310/RCTI6942. PMC 8958412. PMID 35048909.
  176. ^ Berman M, Fenaughty A (June 2005). “Technology and managed care: patient benefits of telemedicine in a rural health care network”. Health Economics. 14 (6). Wiley: 559–573. doi:10.1002/hec.952. PMID 15497196.
  177. ^ Van’t Haaff C (March–April 2009). “Virtually On-sight” (PDF). Just for Canadian Doctors. p. 22. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-24.
  178. ^ Saylor M (2012). The Mobile Wave: How Mobile Intelligence Will Change Everything. Perseus Books/Vanguard Press. p. 153. ISBN 978-1-59315-720-3.
  179. ^ Conde JG, De S, Hall RW, Johansen E, Meglan D, Peng GC (January–February 2010). “Telehealth innovations in health education and training”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 16 (1): 103–106. doi:10.1089/tmj.2009.0152. PMC 2937346. PMID 20155874.
  180. ^ Best J (May 2022). “From Ukraine to remote robotics: how videoconferencing and next generation technology are transforming surgery”. BMJ. 377: o1078. doi:10.1136/bmj.o1078. PMID 35504650. S2CID 248497139.
  181. ^ Snoswell CL, Caffery LJ, Haydon HM, Thomas EE, Smith AC (September 2020). “Telehealth uptake in general practice as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic”. Australian Health Review. 44 (5): 737–740. doi:10.1071/AH20183. hdl:11343/274283. PMID 32853536. S2CID 221357628.
  182. ^ Smith AC, Thomas E, Snoswell CL, Haydon H, Mehrotra A, Clemensen J, et al. (June 2020). “Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 26 (5): 309–313. doi:10.1177/1357633×20916567. PMC 7140977. PMID 32196391.
  183. ^ Zhou X, Snoswell CL, Harding LE, Bambling M, Edirippulige S, Bai X, et al. (April 2020). “The Role of Telehealth in Reducing the Mental Health Burden from COVID-19”. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 26 (4): 377–379. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0068. PMID 32202977.
  184. ^ Payne R, Clarke A, Swann N, Dael Jv, Brenman N, Rosen R, et al. (2024-09-01). “Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis”. BMJ Quality & Safety. 33 (9): 573–586. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674. ISSN 2044-5415. PMC 11347200. PMID 38050161.
  185. ^ “How to make remote consultations safer”. NIHR Evidence. 1 October 2024.
  186. ^ Keck CS, Doarn CR (July 2014). “Telehealth technology applications in speech-language pathology”. Telemedicine Journal and E-health. 20 (7): 653–9. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0295. PMID 24820794.
  187. ^ Jump up to:a b Paul DL. Collaborative activities in virtual settings: A knowledge management perspective of telemedicine. J Manage Inf Syst 2006;22(4):143-176.
  188. ^ Jump up to:a b Cascella LM (2016). Virtual Risk: An Overview of Telehealth From a Risk Management Perspective.
  189. ^ Luz PL (August 2019). “Telemedicine and the Doctor/Patient Relationship”. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 113 (1): 100–102. doi:10.5935/abc.20190117. PMC 6684176. PMID 31411296.
  190. ^ Jump up to:a b Dineen-Griffin S, Garcia-Cardenas V, Williams K, Benrimoj SI (2019-08-01). Leroyer C (ed.). “Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice”. PLOS ONE. 14 (8): e0220116. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1420116D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. PMC 6675068. PMID 31369582.
  191. ^ Hibbard JH, Greene J (February 2013). “What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs”. Health Affairs. 32 (2): 207–214. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061. PMID 23381511. S2CID 11684473.
  192. ^ Hjelm NM (1 March 2005). “Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 11 (2): 60–70. doi:10.1258/1357633053499886. PMID 15829049. S2CID 24145715.
  193. ^ Moffatt JJ (February 2011). “Barriers to the up-take of telemedicine in Australia – a view from providers” (PDF). The University of Queensland, School of Medicine.
  194. ^ Strehle EM, Shabde N (December 2006). “One hundred years of telemedicine: does this new technology have a place in paediatrics?”. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 91 (12): 956–9. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.099622. PMC 2082971. PMID 17119071.
  195. ^ Omboni, S., McManus, R. J., Bosworth, H. B., Chappell, L. C., Green, B. B., Kario, K., … & Wakefield, B. J. (2020). Evidence and recommendations on the use of telemedicine for the management of arterial hypertension: an international expert position paper. Hypertension, 76(5), 1368-1383
  196. ^ Daniel, H., Sulmasy, L. S., & Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians*. (2015). Policy recommendations to guide the use of telemedicine in primary care settings: an American College of Physicians position paper. Annals of internal medicine, 163(10), 787-789.
  197. ^ Dramburg, S., Walter, U., Becker, S., Casper, I., Röseler, S., Schareina, A., … & Klimek, L. (2021). Telemedicine in allergology: practical aspects: A position paper of the Association of German Allergists (AeDA). Allergo Journal International, 30, 119-129.
  198. ^ Costantino, A., Bortoluzzi, F., Giuffrè, M., Vassallo, R., Montalbano, L. M., Monica, F., … & Elli, L. (2021). Correct use of telemedicine in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the Italian association of hospital gastroenterologists and endoscopists (AIGO). Digestive and Liver Disease, 53(10), 1221-1227.
  199. ^ “Survey: Consumers Keen on Telemedicine”. Archived from the original on 2010-04-29. Retrieved 2010-04-26.
  200. ^ 2019 Best Practices in Health Care Employer Survey Highlights, Willis Towers Watson, November 5, 2019
  201. ^ Trends in the Use of Telehealth During the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, January–March 2020, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), October 30, 2020
  202. ^ Kessler SH, Schmidt-Weitmann S (February 2021). “Diseases and Emotions: An Automated Content Analysis of Health Narratives in Inquiries to an Online Health Consultation Service” (PDF). Health Communication. 36 (2): 226–235. doi:10.1080/10410236.2019.1673950. PMID 36112901. S2CID 210568504.
  203. ^ Umefjord G, Sandström H, Malker H, Petersson G (February 2008). “Medical text-based consultations on the Internet: a 4-year study”. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 77 (2): 114–121. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.009. PMID 17317292.
  204. ^ “Willkommen am UniversitätsSpital Zürich”. www.usz.ch (in Swiss High German). Archived from the original on 2020-01-17. Retrieved 2020-01-23.
  205. ^ Refocusing Europe-Africa Strategy: Strategic Importance of eHealth NEPAD. Accessed 28 January 2016.
  206. ^ Gerhard Bethscheider Satellite is vital for a unified, global, E-Health system September 2015 World Teleport Association. Accessed 28 January 2016.
  207. ^ “Telemedicine Practice Guidelines of India”.
  208. ^ “The future of Telemedicine in India”. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  209. ^ “Govt’s telemedicine service crosses 5 million consultations”. Hindustan Times. 2021-05-14. Retrieved 2021-10-10.
  210. ^ Kanjo C, Jere T (May 2015). “On bringing governance into technology: Case of Internet governance and implications for Africa”. 2015 IST-Africa Conference. IEEE. pp. 1–12. doi:10.1109/istafrica.2015.7190589. ISBN 978-1-905824-51-9. S2CID 2013728.
  211. ^ Geldsetzer P, Reinmuth M, Ouma PO, Lautenbach S, Okiro EA, Bärnighausen T, et al. (August 2020). “Mapping physical access to healthcare for older adults in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-sectional analysis with implications for the COVID-19 response”. medRxiv 10.1101/2020.07.17.20152389.
  212. ^ Helping to build sustainable eHealth services in Africa SES Broadband. Company brochure. Accessed 28 January 2016.
  213. ^ Wilk-Jakubowski J (2021). “A review on information systems engineering using vsat networks and their development directions”. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research. 31 (3): 409–428. doi:10.2298/yjor200215015w. S2CID 226657332.
  214. ^ Caleb Henry SES Joins Clinton Global Initiative, Announces SATMED Project September 25, 2014 Satellite Today. Accessed 28 January 2016.
  215. ^ Satmed Archived 2018-07-20 at the Wayback Machine Luxembourg’s Development Cooperation. Accessed February 26, 2016
  216. ^ E-Inclusion: Satellites Are The Answer Satellite Pro. Issue 59 February 2017. Accessed 27 June 2022
  217. ^ SES SATMED ehealth platform deployed in hospital in Benin Reuters June 4, 2015. Accessed February 26, 20166
  218. ^ Executive Spotlight: Gerhard Bethscheider SatMagazine November 2015. Accessed February 26, 20166
  219. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i j k l m Bashshur R, Shannon GW (2009-01-01). History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation. Mary Ann Liebert. ISBN 978-1-934854-11-2.
  220. ^ Jump up to:a b c Nakajima I, Sastrokusumo U, Mishra SK, Komiya R, Malik AZ, Tanuma T (2006-08-01). “The Asia Pacific telecommunity’s telemedicine activities”. HEALTHCOM 2006 8th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services. pp. 280–282. doi:10.1109/HEALTH.2006.246471. ISBN 978-0-7803-9704-0. S2CID 28788501.
  221. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Cuffia A (2019-01-02). “The Medical Library Association Guide to Developing Consumer Health Collections”. Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 19 (1): 84–85. doi:10.1080/15323269.2019.1568127. ISSN 1532-3269. S2CID 86403514.
  222. ^ Jump up to:a b Zundel KM (January 1996). “Telemedicine: history, applications, and impact on librarianship”. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 84 (1): 71–9. PMC 226126. PMID 8938332.
  223. ^ Bonica GM, Johns RW, Jadvar H (July 1, 2024). “Telehealth and Telemedicine: Regulatory and Medicolegal Landscape”. Clin Nucl Med. 49 (7): 644–647. doi:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005254. PMID 38769654.
  224. ^ Novak M (14 March 2012). “Telemedicine Predicted in 1925”. The Smithsonian Institution.
  225. ^ Elizabeth M (2022), ‘Better outcomes’: B.C. organization gets American award for championing Indigenous children, Canada: Global News, retrieved 2023-08-01
  226. ^ “A Brief History of Telemedicine” Archived 2007-11-24 at the Wayback Machine, Telemedicine Information Exchange website, (Accessed December 10, 2008)
  227. ^ Jump up to:a b Weinstein RS, Holcomb MJ, Krupinski EA, Latifi R (2021). “First Trainees: The Golden Anniversary of the Early History of Telemedicine Education at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard (1968–1970)”. Telemedicine, Telehealth and Telepresence. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 3–18. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56917-4_1. ISBN 978-3-030-56916-7. S2CID 229427661.
  228. ^ Jump up to:a b c Allan R (28 June 2006). “A Brief History Of Telemedicine”. Electronic Design.
  229. ^ Buhler LH (January 2019). “Recollections of Pioneers in Xenotransplantation Research Edited by David K. C.Cooper, Nova Medicine and Health, Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY, 2018”. Xenotransplantation. 26 (1): e12495. doi:10.1111/xen.12495. ISSN 0908-665X. S2CID 91740391.
  230. ^ “Highlights from the Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Telemedicine Association” (Accessed December 10, 2008), Medscape website
  231. ^ Jump up to:a b c d Harer WB (August 1979). “Tel-Med–a success story”. The Western Journal of Medicine. 131 (2): 162–164. PMC 1271730. PMID 516712.
  232. ^ Jump up to:a b c Rovner S (7 September 1979). “Health Talk: With Tel-Med, Medical Information Is Only a Phone Call Away”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  233. ^ “Tel-Med Proves Its Versatility”. The San Bernardino Sun. 10 January 1973. p. 22. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  234. ^ Markman J (August 26, 2018). “NASA-Incubated Healthcare Provider Is Out Of This World”. Retrieved 2019-10-06.
  235. ^ Illove M (January 21, 2016). “State Prisons Turn to Telemedicine to Improve Health and Save Money”. The PEW Charitable Trusts. Retrieved 2019-10-03.
  236. ^ Freudenheim M (May 29, 2010). “The Doctor Will See You Now. Please Log On”. The New York Times. Retrieved 2019-10-03.
  237. ^ Blyth WJ (1990). Telecommunications, Concepts, Development, and Management (Second ed.). Glencoe/McCgraw-Hill. pp. 280–282. ISBN 978-0-02-680841-5.
  238. ^ Goodman M (November 2016). “How the North Texas Telemedicine Revolution Began”. D Magazine. Retrieved 2019-10-03.
  239. ^ Dinesen B, Nonnecke B, Lindeman D, Toft E, Kidholm K, Jethwani K, et al. (March 2016). “Personalized Telehealth in the Future: A Global Research Agenda”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18 (3): e53. doi:10.2196/jmir.5257. PMC 4795318. PMID 26932229.
  240. ^ Allen A (November 8, 2017). “A hospital without patients”. Politico. Retrieved 2019-10-06.
  241. ^ Jump up to:a b Schiffman R (2021-02-25). “Learning to Listen to Patients’ Stories”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2021-11-18.
  242. ^ Costantino A, Noviello D, Mazza S, Berté R, Caprioli F, Vecchi M (March 2021). “Trust in telemedicine from IBD outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic”. Dig Liver Dis. 53 (3): 291–4. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.035. PMC 7644233. PMID 33187917.
  243. ^ Thomas EE, Haydon HM, Mehrotra A, Caffery LJ, Snoswell CL, Banbury A, et al. (May 2022). “Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19”. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 28 (4): 301–8. doi:10.1177/1357633X20960638. PMID 32985380. S2CID 222154106.
  244. ^ “Telemedicine could help the world achieve health equity by bringing care to the home – here’s how”. World Economic Forum. 12 January 2023. Retrieved 2023-01-12.

Share

× How can I help you?