ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

By IT ADMIN Uncategorized

ISO 16087:2013 is an international standard titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).” This standard provides specifications and requirements for ceramic materials used in surgical implants, specifically those based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).

Key Points of ISO 16087:2013:

  1. Scope: The standard applies to ceramic materials intended for use in surgical implants, particularly those made from Y-TZP. It specifies the chemical composition, mechanical properties, and performance characteristics that these materials must meet to ensure their suitability for use in surgical applications.
  2. Material Requirements: ISO 16087:2013 outlines the requirements for the composition of Y-TZP ceramics, including the percentage of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) stabilized with yttrium oxide (Y2O3). It also covers other elements that may be present and their permissible limits.
  3. Mechanical Properties: The standard specifies mechanical properties such as strength, fracture toughness, hardness, and resistance to aging or degradation over time. These properties are crucial for ensuring the durability and reliability of ceramic implants in surgical procedures.
  4. Biocompatibility: ISO 16087:2013 addresses the biocompatibility requirements of Y-TZP ceramic materials. It includes testing methods and limits for cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation or intracutaneous reactivity, and systemic toxicity, ensuring that the implants do not cause adverse reactions in the body.
  5. Manufacturing and Testing: The standard provides guidelines for the manufacturing processes of Y-TZP ceramics, including methods for forming, sintering, and finishing the materials. It also specifies testing procedures to evaluate the material’s properties and performance under simulated physiological conditions.
  6. Quality Assurance: ISO 16087:2013 includes requirements for quality assurance systems and documentation that manufacturers must adhere to when producing ceramic implants. This ensures consistency and traceability throughout the manufacturing process.
  7. Clinical Considerations: The standard emphasizes the importance of clinical evaluation and follow-up of ceramic implants made from Y-TZP. It encourages manufacturers to conduct clinical studies and gather post-market surveillance data to assess the long-term performance and safety of the implants in patients.

Applications of ISO 16087:2013:

  • Dental Implants: Y-TZP ceramics are commonly used in dental implants due to their high strength, biocompatibility, and aesthetic qualities. ISO 16087:2013 helps ensure that dental implants made from these materials meet stringent quality and performance standards.
  • Orthopedic Implants: Ceramic materials based on Y-TZP are also used in orthopedic implants, such as hip joint replacements and bone screws. The standard ensures that these implants withstand the mechanical stresses and biological interactions in the human body.
  • Maxillofacial Surgery: Y-TZP ceramics may be used in reconstructive surgeries of the jawbone and facial bones. ISO 16087:2013 helps manufacturers produce implants that promote bone integration and long-term stability.

In summary, ISO 16087:2013 provides essential guidelines and requirements for the development, manufacturing, and testing of ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) used in surgical implants. It plays a critical role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of ceramic implants in various surgical applications, contributing to advancements in medical technology and patient care.

What is ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

ISO 16087:2013 is an international standard titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).” This standard specifies requirements and provides guidelines for ceramic materials used in surgical implants, particularly those made from yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).

Key Aspects of ISO 16087:2013:

  1. Scope: The standard applies specifically to ceramic materials intended for use in surgical implants. It focuses on Y-TZP ceramics due to their mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and resistance to corrosion and wear.
  2. Material Composition: ISO 16087:2013 details the chemical composition requirements for Y-TZP ceramics, including the proportions of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) stabilized with yttrium oxide (Y2O3). These compositions are critical for ensuring the material’s strength and stability under physiological conditions.
  3. Mechanical Properties: The standard specifies mechanical properties such as flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness. These properties are essential for evaluating the structural integrity and durability of ceramic implants in surgical applications.
  4. Biocompatibility: ISO 16087:2013 addresses the biocompatibility of Y-TZP ceramics, ensuring that the materials do not elicit adverse reactions when implanted in the human body. This includes testing for cytotoxicity, sensitization, and other biological responses.
  5. Manufacturing Requirements: The standard provides guidelines for the manufacturing processes of Y-TZP ceramics, including methods for forming, sintering, and finishing the materials. It emphasizes quality control and assurance throughout the production chain to ensure consistency and reliability of the implants.
  6. Testing and Evaluation: ISO 16087:2013 outlines testing methods and criteria for evaluating Y-TZP ceramics. This includes mechanical testing, chemical analysis, and assessment of the material’s behavior under simulated physiological conditions.
  7. Clinical Considerations: The standard encourages manufacturers to conduct clinical evaluations and post-market surveillance studies to assess the performance and safety of Y-TZP ceramic implants in clinical settings. This data helps in evaluating long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Applications of ISO 16087:2013:

  • Dental Implants: Y-TZP ceramics are commonly used in dental implants due to their aesthetic properties, biocompatibility, and mechanical strength. The standard ensures that dental implants made from these materials meet rigorous quality and performance criteria.
  • Orthopedic Implants: Ceramic materials based on Y-TZP are also used in orthopedic applications, such as hip joint replacements and bone screws. ISO 16087:2013 helps in producing implants that can withstand the mechanical demands and biological interactions in orthopedic surgeries.
  • Maxillofacial Surgery: Y-TZP ceramics may be used in reconstructive surgeries of the jawbone and facial bones. The standard supports the development of implants that promote osseointegration and long-term stability in maxillofacial procedures.

ISO 16087:2013 plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and reliability of ceramic materials used in surgical implants. By providing standardized requirements and guidelines, the standard facilitates innovation and advancement in implant technology, contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of care in surgical practices worldwide.

Who is required ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

ISO 16087:2013, titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP),” is primarily intended for use by various stakeholders involved in the development, manufacturing, regulation, and use of ceramic materials used in surgical implants. Here’s who typically utilizes or is required to adhere to ISO 16087:2013:

  1. Manufacturers of Surgical Implants: Companies and organizations involved in the manufacturing and production of ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) for surgical implants are required to comply with ISO 16087:2013. This includes ensuring that their products meet the standard’s requirements for material composition, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and manufacturing processes.
  2. Regulatory Authorities: Health regulatory authorities and agencies responsible for overseeing the approval and registration of surgical implants often reference ISO 16087:2013 as part of their regulatory frameworks. Compliance with the standard may be required for manufacturers to obtain regulatory clearance or approval to market their ceramic implant products.
  3. Healthcare Providers: Surgeons, dentists, and other healthcare professionals who use ceramic implants in surgical procedures are indirectly impacted by ISO 16087:2013. They rely on manufacturers to ensure that implants meet the standard’s requirements for safety, performance, and compatibility with human tissues.
  4. Research and Development: Professionals involved in research and development of ceramic materials for surgical implants use ISO 16087:2013 as a benchmark for designing and testing new materials. The standard provides guidance on material properties, testing methodologies, and performance criteria that inform R&D efforts in implant technology.
  5. Quality Assurance and Compliance Officers: Within manufacturing companies, quality assurance and compliance officers ensure that manufacturing processes align with ISO 16087:2013 requirements. They oversee quality control measures, documentation, and audits to maintain conformity to the standard and ensure consistent product quality.
  6. Standards Organizations and Consultants: Standards organizations, consultants, and experts in implant technology and materials science may provide guidance on interpreting and implementing ISO 16087:2013. They assist manufacturers and regulatory bodies in understanding and applying the standard’s provisions effectively.

In summary, ISO 16087:2013 is essential for manufacturers of ceramic surgical implants, regulatory authorities, healthcare providers, and professionals involved in implant research and development. Adherence to the standard ensures that ceramic implants based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) meet rigorous quality and safety standards, promoting patient safety and enhancing the reliability of surgical procedures involving these materials.

When is required ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

ISO 16087:2013, which focuses on ceramic materials used in surgical implants based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP), is typically required in several contexts within the field of surgical implants. Here are some key scenarios when compliance with ISO 16087:2013 is necessary or recommended:

  1. Regulatory Approval and Certification:
  • Medical Device Regulations: In many countries, surgical implants, including ceramic materials, must undergo regulatory approval or certification before they can be marketed and used in clinical practice. ISO 16087:2013 provides a framework for demonstrating compliance with essential requirements related to material composition, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and manufacturing processes. Manufacturers must adhere to these standards to obtain regulatory clearance or CE marking in Europe, for example.
  1. Quality Management Systems:
  • ISO 13485 Certification: Manufacturers of surgical implants often maintain ISO 13485 certification, which includes compliance with relevant ISO standards such as ISO 16087:2013. ISO 13485 specifies requirements for quality management systems specifically for medical device manufacturers, ensuring that products consistently meet customer and regulatory requirements.
  1. Clinical Trials and Research:
  • Product Development: During the development phase of ceramic implants, researchers and developers use ISO 16087:2013 as a reference to guide material selection, testing protocols, and performance evaluation. Compliance with the standard ensures that the implants meet stringent criteria for safety, efficacy, and durability under simulated physiological conditions.
  1. Healthcare Procurement and Standards:
  • Hospital and Healthcare Facility Requirements: Healthcare providers and institutions often require that surgical implants used in their facilities meet recognized international standards like ISO 16087:2013. Compliance assures them of the quality, reliability, and safety of the implants used in surgical procedures, contributing to patient safety and positive outcomes.
  1. International Market Access:
  • Global Trade: Manufacturers aiming to export ceramic surgical implants to international markets must comply with ISO 16087:2013 to meet the standards and expectations of regulatory bodies and healthcare providers in those regions. The standard facilitates market access by demonstrating adherence to globally accepted quality and safety requirements.
  1. Quality Assurance and Risk Management:
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Manufacturers implement ISO 16087:2013 to establish rigorous quality assurance processes and risk management strategies throughout the lifecycle of ceramic implants. This includes monitoring performance in clinical use, evaluating adverse events, and implementing corrective and preventive actions as necessary.

In conclusion, ISO 16087:2013 is required in various stages of the lifecycle of ceramic materials used in surgical implants, from initial development and regulatory approval to clinical use and post-market surveillance. Compliance with the standard ensures that ceramic implants meet high standards of quality, safety, and performance, benefiting manufacturers, healthcare providers, regulatory bodies, and ultimately, patients undergoing surgical procedures involving these implants.

Where is required ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

ISO 16087:2013, which specifies requirements for ceramic materials used in surgical implants based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP), is required or highly recommended in several key sectors and settings related to surgical implants:

  1. Manufacturing and Production Facilities:
  • Implant Manufacturers: Companies involved in the manufacturing of ceramic materials for surgical implants must adhere to ISO 16087:2013. Compliance ensures that their products meet the standard’s specifications for material composition, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and manufacturing processes.
  1. Regulatory and Compliance Standards:
  • Regulatory Authorities: Health regulatory bodies in various countries reference ISO 16087:2013 as part of their regulatory frameworks for approving and certifying surgical implants. Compliance with the standard is often a prerequisite for obtaining regulatory clearance or CE marking in Europe, demonstrating that implants meet essential safety and performance requirements.
  1. Healthcare Institutions and Procurement:
  • Hospitals and Healthcare Facilities: Healthcare providers require assurance that surgical implants used in their facilities meet recognized international standards like ISO 16087:2013. Compliance ensures that implants are safe, effective, and reliable for use in surgical procedures, thereby safeguarding patient safety and outcomes.
  1. Research and Development:
  • Medical Device Developers and Researchers: Professionals involved in the research, development, and innovation of surgical implants use ISO 16087:2013 as a reference standard. It guides material selection, testing methodologies, and performance evaluation to ensure that implants meet stringent criteria for quality and efficacy.
  1. Quality Management Systems:
  • ISO 13485 Certification: Manufacturers of surgical implants often maintain ISO 13485 certification, which includes compliance with ISO 16087:2013. ISO 13485 specifies requirements for quality management systems specific to medical device manufacturing, ensuring consistent adherence to regulatory and customer requirements.
  1. International Trade and Market Access:
  • Global Market Requirements: Manufacturers seeking to export ceramic surgical implants to international markets must comply with ISO 16087:2013 to meet the standards and expectations of regulatory bodies and healthcare providers globally. Compliance facilitates market access by demonstrating conformity to internationally recognized quality and safety standards.

In summary, ISO 16087:2013 is required or recommended in manufacturing facilities, regulatory environments, healthcare institutions, research settings, and quality management systems related to surgical implants. Compliance with the standard ensures that ceramic materials used in implants meet stringent criteria for safety, efficacy, and performance, supporting patient safety and quality healthcare delivery worldwide.

How is required ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

ISO 16087:2013, titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP),” outlines specific requirements and guidelines for ceramic materials used in surgical implants. Here’s how ISO 16087:2013 is applied and required in various aspects of the implant manufacturing and regulatory processes:

Manufacturing and Production

  1. Material Composition and Specifications:
  • Requirements: Manufacturers of ceramic materials for surgical implants must ensure that their products adhere to the chemical composition specifications outlined in ISO 16087:2013. This includes precise percentages of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) stabilized with yttrium oxide (Y2O3) to achieve the desired mechanical and biological properties.
  1. Mechanical Properties:
  • Testing and Compliance: The standard specifies mechanical properties such as flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness that ceramic materials must meet. Manufacturers conduct rigorous testing to demonstrate compliance with these requirements, ensuring that implants are strong and durable enough to withstand physiological stresses.
  1. Biocompatibility and Safety:
  • Testing and Validation: ISO 16087:2013 includes requirements for biocompatibility testing to assess the interaction of ceramic implants with living tissues. This ensures that the materials do not cause adverse reactions or harm to patients when implanted, supporting their safety and compatibility for surgical use.

Regulatory Compliance

  1. Regulatory Approval:
  • CE Marking (Europe): Compliance with ISO 16087:2013 is often a prerequisite for obtaining CE marking, which signifies conformity with European Union directives for medical devices. Regulatory authorities require manufacturers to demonstrate that their ceramic implants meet the safety and performance criteria defined in international standards like ISO 16087:2013.
  1. Documentation and Quality Management Systems:
  • ISO 13485 Certification: Manufacturers maintain ISO 13485 certification, which incorporates ISO 16087:2013 requirements. This certification ensures that the manufacturer has established and maintains an effective quality management system for the design, development, production, and distribution of medical devices, including ceramic implants.

Clinical Application

  1. Use in Surgical Procedures:
  • Healthcare Providers: Surgeons and healthcare providers rely on ISO 16087:2013-compliant ceramic implants for performing surgical procedures. Compliance assures them that the implants meet international standards for quality, safety, and performance, contributing to positive patient outcomes.
  1. Post-Market Surveillance:
  • Monitoring and Evaluation: Manufacturers conduct post-market surveillance to monitor the performance of ceramic implants in clinical use. This includes collecting data on patient outcomes and adverse events to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness, as well as identifying areas for continuous improvement.

Research and Development

  1. Innovation and Advancements:
  • Guidance for R&D: Researchers and developers use ISO 16087:2013 as a reference standard for advancing ceramic implant technology. The standard guides the selection of materials, design considerations, and testing protocols to innovate and improve the performance and reliability of future implant designs.

Conclusion

ISO 16087:2013 plays a critical role in ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of ceramic materials used in surgical implants. By establishing clear requirements for material composition, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and manufacturing processes, the standard supports manufacturers in producing high-quality implants that meet regulatory expectations and healthcare provider requirements. Compliance with ISO 16087:2013 ultimately contributes to enhancing patient safety, improving surgical outcomes, and advancing the field of surgical implant technology.

Case study on ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

Currently, I don’t have access to specific case studies on ISO 16087:2013, but I can outline a hypothetical case study to illustrate its application and impact in the field of surgical implants based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).

Case Study: Implementation of ISO 16087:2013 in Ceramic Surgical Implants

Background:
XYZ Medical Devices Inc. is a manufacturer specializing in ceramic materials for surgical implants. They have developed a new line of Y-TZP ceramic implants intended for use in orthopedic and dental surgeries. To ensure their products meet global standards for quality, safety, and performance, XYZ Medical Devices Inc. decides to comply with ISO 16087:2013.

Objective:
To implement ISO 16087:2013 requirements in the development, manufacturing, and regulatory approval process of ceramic surgical implants.

Implementation Steps:

  1. Material Selection and Formulation:
  • XYZ Medical Devices Inc. selects Y-TZP ceramic materials based on ISO 16087:2013 specifications, ensuring the correct composition of zirconium oxide stabilized with yttrium oxide to achieve optimal mechanical and biological properties.
  1. Manufacturing Processes:
  • The company establishes manufacturing processes that align with ISO 16087:2013 guidelines. This includes methods for forming, sintering, and finishing the ceramic implants to meet stringent mechanical strength and biocompatibility requirements.
  1. Quality Assurance and Testing:
  • Quality control measures are implemented throughout the production chain to ensure consistency and compliance with ISO 16087:2013. Mechanical testing is conducted to verify properties such as flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness, ensuring implants meet specified standards.
  1. Biocompatibility Assessment:
  • Biocompatibility testing is performed according to ISO 10993 series standards referenced in ISO 16087:2013. This includes evaluating cytotoxicity, sensitization, and other biological responses to confirm that the ceramic implants do not pose risks to patients’ health.
  1. Regulatory Compliance:
  • XYZ Medical Devices Inc. prepares documentation and submits their ceramic implants for regulatory approval, demonstrating compliance with ISO 16087:2013 requirements. This includes compiling technical files and conducting audits to meet regulatory standards for CE marking or other market approvals.

Results and Benefits:

  • Enhanced Product Quality: Compliance with ISO 16087:2013 ensures that XYZ Medical Devices Inc. produces ceramic implants of high quality, reliability, and durability, meeting global standards for surgical applications.
  • Market Access: Certification to ISO 16087:2013 facilitates market access in Europe and other regions requiring CE marking, demonstrating the implants’ safety and performance to regulatory authorities and healthcare providers.
  • Patient Safety: The implementation of ISO 16087:2013 contributes to improved patient safety by ensuring that ceramic implants used in surgeries are biocompatible, mechanically robust, and compatible with physiological environments.

Conclusion:
Through the implementation of ISO 16087:2013, XYZ Medical Devices Inc. successfully develops and manufactures ceramic surgical implants that meet stringent international standards for quality and safety. The company’s commitment to compliance enhances its reputation, supports regulatory approval processes, and ultimately contributes to better patient outcomes in orthopedic and dental surgeries.

This hypothetical case study illustrates how ISO 16087:2013 can be applied in the real-world context of manufacturing and regulatory compliance for ceramic surgical implants. Actual case studies from manufacturers and healthcare providers would provide further insights into specific challenges, achievements, and impacts of implementing this standard in practice.

White paper on ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

As of my last update, specific white papers exclusively dedicated to ISO 16087:2013, titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP),” may not be widely available. However, white papers or technical documents that discuss aspects of ceramic materials in surgical implants, including those aligned with ISO standards, can provide valuable insights. These documents typically cover topics such as material properties, manufacturing processes, regulatory considerations, and clinical applications.

To find relevant resources or white papers related to ISO 16087:2013 and ceramic surgical implants, consider the following approaches:

  1. Industry Associations and Organizations: Check websites of medical device industry associations, such as ISO itself (iso.org), the International Organization for Standardization, or other national standards bodies. These organizations often publish technical reports, guidelines, or white papers related to specific ISO standards.
  2. Medical Device Manufacturers: Leading manufacturers in the field of surgical implants sometimes publish white papers or technical documents discussing their products’ compliance with ISO standards. These documents can provide practical insights into how ISO standards are applied in real-world manufacturing and regulatory contexts.
  3. Academic and Research Institutions: Universities and research institutions may publish research papers or technical reports related to ceramic materials in surgical implants. These publications often explore materials science, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and clinical outcomes, aligning with ISO standards.
  4. Medical Journals and Publications: Peer-reviewed medical journals occasionally feature articles on materials used in surgical implants, including ceramics. These articles may reference ISO standards and provide in-depth analyses of their application in clinical practice.
  5. Consulting Firms and Regulatory Experts: Consultancy firms specializing in medical device regulations and compliance may offer white papers or guides on ISO standards relevant to surgical implants. These resources can provide practical advice and insights based on industry expertise.

By exploring these sources, you can gather comprehensive information and insights into ISO 16087:2013 and its application in the development, manufacturing, and regulatory approval of ceramic materials for surgical implants.

Industrial application of ISO 16087:2013 Implants for surgery

The industrial application of ISO 16087:2013, titled “Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP),” focuses on ensuring the quality, safety, and performance of ceramic materials used in surgical implants. Here are key aspects of its industrial application:

Manufacturing and Production

  1. Material Selection and Formulation:
  • Manufacturers in the medical device industry use ISO 16087:2013 to guide the selection and formulation of ceramic materials, specifically Y-TZP, for surgical implants. The standard specifies the chemical composition requirements, including the percentages of zirconium oxide (ZrO2) stabilized with yttrium oxide (Y2O3), to achieve desired mechanical and biological properties.
  1. Process Control and Quality Assurance:
  • The standard sets guidelines for manufacturing processes such as forming, sintering, and finishing of ceramic implants. Manufacturers implement stringent process controls and quality assurance measures to ensure consistency and reliability of the implants. This includes testing procedures to verify mechanical properties like flexural strength and fracture toughness, crucial for ensuring implant durability and performance.

Regulatory Compliance

  1. CE Marking and International Standards:
  • Compliance with ISO 16087:2013 is often a prerequisite for obtaining CE marking in Europe, indicating conformity with European Union directives for medical devices. Manufacturers must demonstrate that their ceramic implants meet the safety, efficacy, and quality requirements outlined in the standard to gain market access.
  1. Global Market Access:
  • ISO 16087:2013 facilitates global market access by providing a recognized framework for demonstrating product compliance with international standards. Manufacturers align their regulatory submissions and quality management systems with ISO requirements to meet the diverse regulatory requirements of different markets worldwide.

Clinical Application

  1. Biocompatibility and Patient Safety:
  • Ceramic materials based on Y-TZP, compliant with ISO 16087:2013, undergo rigorous biocompatibility testing to ensure they do not elicit adverse reactions or toxicity when implanted in the human body. This testing includes assessments for cytotoxicity, sensitization, and other biological responses, crucial for patient safety and implant success.
  1. Long-Term Performance and Stability:
  • Implants manufactured according to ISO 16087:2013 are designed to exhibit long-term stability and performance in clinical settings. The standard’s requirements for mechanical properties and material characteristics contribute to implants that withstand physiological stresses and maintain integrity over time.

Research and Development

  1. Innovation and Advancements:
  • Researchers and developers leverage ISO 16087:2013 as a framework for advancing ceramic implant technology. The standard guides R&D efforts in improving material properties, refining manufacturing processes, and exploring new applications for ceramic materials in surgical implants.

Quality Management Systems

  1. ISO 13485 Certification:
  • Manufacturers maintain ISO 13485 certification, which encompasses compliance with ISO 16087:2013 requirements. ISO 13485 specifies requirements for quality management systems specific to medical device manufacturing, ensuring consistent adherence to regulatory and customer requirements.

In conclusion, the industrial application of ISO 16087:2013 in implants for surgery underscores its role in promoting standardized practices, enhancing product quality, and ensuring patient safety in the field of ceramic surgical implants. Manufacturers, regulatory authorities, healthcare providers, and researchers all benefit from its guidelines and requirements, contributing to advancements in medical technology and improved patient care outcomes.

  1.  Kenton, Will. “Manufacturing”. Investopedia. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  2. ^ Thadani, Akhil; Allen, Gregory C. (May 30, 2023). “Mapping the Semiconductor Supply Chain: The Critical Role of the Indo-Pacific Region”. CSIS.
  3. ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010). “manufacture, n.“. Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acres/9780199571123.001.0001 (inactive November 1, 2024). ISBN 978-0199571123.
  4. ^ Srivatsan, T. S.; Manigandan, K.; Sudarshan, T. S. (2018). “Use of Conventional Manufacturing Techniques for Materials”. In Srivatsan, T. S.; Sudarshan, T. S.; Manigandan, K. (eds.). Manufacturing Techniques for Materials: Engineering and Engineered. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 436–437. ISBN 978-1138099265.
  5. ^ Youssef, Helmi A.; El-Hofy, Hassan (2008). Machining Technology: Machine Tools and Operations. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-1420043396.
  6. ^ “Human Ancestors Hall: Homo sapiens”. Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  7. ^ “Ancient ‘Tool Factory’ Uncovered”. BBC News. May 6, 1999. Archived from the original on March 18, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  8. ^ Heinzelin, Jean de; Clark, JD; White, T; Hart, W; Renne, P; Woldegabriel, G; Beyene, Y; Vrba, E (April 1999). “Environment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids”. Science. 284 (5414): 625–629. Bibcode:1999Sci…284..625D. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.625. PMID 10213682.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b Burke, Ariane. “Archaeology”. Encyclopedia Americana. Archived from the original on May 21, 2008. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  10. ^ Plummer, Thomas (2004). “Flaked Stones and Old Bones: Biological and Cultural Evolution at the Dawn of Technology”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Suppl 39 (47). Yearbook of Physical Anthropology: 118–64. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20157. PMID 15605391.
  11. ^ Haviland, William A. (2004). Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. The Thomson Corporation. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-534-62487-3.
  12. ^ Tóth, Zsuzsanna (2012). “The First Neolithic Sites in Central/South-East European Transect, Volume III: The Körös Culture in Eastern Hungary”. In Anders, Alexandra; Siklósi, Zsuzsanna (eds.). Bone, Antler, and Tusk tools of the Early Neolithic Körös Culture. Oxford: BAR International Series 2334.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c Merson, John (1990). The Genius That Was China: East and West in the Making of the Modern World. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-87951-397-9.
  14. ^ Paine, Lincoln (2013). The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World. New York: Random House, LLC.
  15. ^ Jane C., Waldbaum (1978). From Bronze to Iron: The Transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in the Eastern Mediterranean. Paul Aström. pp. 56–58. ISBN 91-85058-79-3. OCLC 1146527679.
  16. ^ Photos, E. (1989). “The Question of Meteoritic versus Smelted Nickel-Rich Iron: Archaeological Evidence and Experimental Results”. World Archaeology. 20 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/00438243.1989.9980081. JSTOR 124562. S2CID 5908149.
  17. ^ Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999). Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1575060422.
  18. ^ Potts, D. T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  19. ^ Trzciński, Jerzy; Zaremba, Małgorzata; Rzepka, Sławomir; Welc, Fabian; Szczepański, Tomasz (June 1, 2016). “Preliminary Report on Engineering Properties and Environmental Resistance of Ancient Mud Bricks from Tell El-Retaba Archaeological Site in the Nile Delta”. Studia Quaternaria. 33 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1515/squa-2016-0005. ISSN 2300-0384. S2CID 132452242.
  20. ^ “Timeline: 8th century”. 8th century. ISBN 978-0191735516. Archived from the original on August 25, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  21. ^ de Safita, Neathery (July 2002). “A Brief History Of Paper”. St. Louis Community College. Archived from the original on August 22, 2018. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  22. ^ Marchetti, Cesare (1978). “A Postmortem Technology Assessment of the Spinning Wheel: The Last 1000 Years, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13; pp. 91–93” (PDF). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 2, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  23. ^ Rosen, William (2012). The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry and Invention. University Of Chicago Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-226-72634-2.
  24. ^ “Industrial History of European Countries”. European Route of Industrial Heritage. Council of Europe. Archived from the original on June 23, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b c Landes, David S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.
  26. ^ Gupta, Bishnupriya. “Cotton Textiles and the Great Divergence: Lancashire, India and Shifting Competitive Advantage, 1600–1850” (PDF). International Institute of Social History. Department of Economics, University of Warwick. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  27. ^ Taylor, George Rogers (1951). The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860. Rinehart. ISBN 978-0-87332-101-3.
  28. ^ Roe, Joseph Wickham (1916). English and American Tool Builders. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. LCCN 16011753. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021. Reprinted by McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1926 (LCCN 27-24075); and by Lindsay Publications, Inc., Bradley, Illinois, (ISBN 978-0-917914-73-7)
  29. ^ Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. p. 18.
  30. ^ Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States and London, England: The MIT Press.
  31. ^ Thomson, Ross (1989). The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1867-1.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b c Hounshell, David A. (1984). From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-2975-8. LCCN 83016269. OCLC 1104810110.
  33. ^ Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  34. ^ Jerome, Harry (1934). Mechanization in Industry, National Bureau of Economic Research. p. xxviii.
  35. ^ Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press. pp. 14, 15.
  36. ^ Hounshell 1984, p. 288
  37. ^ Ohno, Taiichi (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-915299-14-0.
  38. ^ Shingō, Shigeo (1985). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. ISBN 0-915299-03-8. OCLC 12255263. Archived from the original on January 14, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  39. ^ “Site of BMC/Leyland Australia Manufacturing Plant: Nomination as an Historic Engineering Marker” (PDF). The Institution of Engineers, Australia. September 30, 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  40. ^ Ashburn, A. (July 1977). “Toyota’s “famous Ohno system””. American Machinist: 120–123.
  41. ^ Sugimori, Y.; Kusunoki, K.; Cho, F.; Uchikawa, S. (1977). “Toyota Production System and Kanban System: Materialization of Just-in-time and Respect-for-human System”. International Journal of Production Research. 15 (6): 553–564. doi:10.1080/00207547708943149. ISSN 0020-7543.
  42. ^ “The Founding of the Association for Manufacturing Excellence: Summarized at a Meeting of its Founders, February 2, 2001” (PDF). Target. 17 (3). Association for Manufacturing Excellence: 23–24. 2001. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  43. ^ Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. (1988), Dynamic Manufacturing, New York: The Free Press, quoted in Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., “Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy“, p. 1, INSEAD, published April 6, 1991, accessed September 27, 2023
  44. ^ R. Sarmiento, G. Whelan, M. Thürer and F. A. Bribiescas-Silva, “Fifty Years of the Strategic Trade-Offs Model: In Memory and Honor of Wickham Skinner”, in IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 1 Second Quarter, June 2019, doi:10.1109/EMR.2019.2915978, accessed August 22, 2023
  45. ^ Skinner, W., “Focused Factory“, Harvard Business Review, published May 1, 1974.
  46. ^ Jump up to:a b Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., “Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy“, p. 2, INSEAD, published April 6, 1991, accessed September 27, 2023
  47. ^ Haas, E. A., “Breakthrough Manufacturing”, Harvard Business Review, March/April 1987, pp. 75–81
  48. ^ Skinner, W., “Missing the Links in Manufacturing Strategy” in Voss, C. A. (ed) (1992), Manufacturing Strategy – Process and Content, Chapman and Hall, pp. 12–25
  49. ^ Hill, T., Manufacturing Strategy: Developments in Approach and Analytics, University of Warwick, 1990, accessed 28 September 2023
  50. ^ Hill, T. (1993), Manufacturing Strategy, second edition, Macmillan, chapter 2
  51. ^ Di Stefano, Cristina; Fratocchi, Luciano; Martínez-Mora, Carmen; Merino, Fernando (August 2, 2023). “Manufacturing reshoring and sustainable development goals: A home versus host country perspective”. Sustainable Development. 32: 863–875. doi:10.1002/sd.2710. hdl:10045/136803.
  52. ^ Young, Julie. “Unit Cost Definition”. investopedia.com. Investopedia. Archived from the original on May 20, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  53. ^ Spence, Michael (1984). “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance”. Econometrica. 52 (1). Econometrica – Journal of the Economic Society, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. 1984): 101–121. doi:10.2307/1911463. JSTOR 1911463. Archived from the original on March 5, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  54. ^ “PPC-R01.2N-N-V2-FW | PPC Controllers | Indramat Controls | Indramat USA”. indramat-usa.com. Retrieved May 30, 2024.
  55. ^ “Manufacturing Program”. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 11, 2019. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  56. ^ “National Occupational Research Agenda for Manufacturing”. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 4, 2019. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  57. ^ Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance (2nd ed.). Manchester: Industrial Systems Research. 2002. ISBN 0-906321-25-5. OCLC 49552466.
  58. ^ Research, Industrial Systems (2002). Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance. Industrial Systems Research. ISBN 978-0-906321-25-6. Archived from the original on April 1, 2021. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
  59. ^ David Bailey; Soyoung Kim (June 26, 2009). “GE’s Immelt says U.S. economy needs industrial renewal”. Reuters. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  60. ^ “Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters?”. February 2012. Archived from the original on October 8, 2012.
  61. ^ Martin Crutsinger (2007). “Factory Jobs: 3 Million Lost Since 2000”. USA Today. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  62. ^ “UNIDO Statistics Data Portal”. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  63. ^ “Leading Manufacturing Nations”. July 15, 2021. Archived from the original on March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  64. ^ “UNIDO’s Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles”. unido.org. Archived from the original on April 6, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  65. ^ “Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles ( Report)”. stat.unido.org. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  66. ^ “2022 United States Manufacturing Facts”. NAM. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  67. ^ “All Employees, Manufacturing/All Employees, Total Nonfarm*100 | FRED | St. Louis Fed”. fred.stlouisfed.org. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  68. ^ “Employment in manufacturing in January 2023: +1.5% year on year”. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  69. ^ “Manufacturing, Value Added (Current US$)”. World Bank. Archived from the original on January 7, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2021.
  70. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) – Advisory Information
  71. ^ SEC – Compliance Programs of Investment Companies and Investment Advisers
  72. ^ European Union – Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive
  73. ^ European Union – Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
  74. ^ (in Spanish) Ley 20.393 – Criminal Liability of Legal Entities
  75. ^ (in Spanish) Normas de la Unidad de Análisis Financiero
  76. ^ What is a Compliance Officer (CC) – Advisory Information
  77. ^ United Nations – Sustainable Development Goal 16
  78. Wang Ping (April 2011), A Brief History of Standards and Standardization Organizations: A Chinese Perspective, East–West Center
  79. ^ Anja Drame (6 January 2006), “International Terminology Standardization; reasons, institutions, results, implementation” (PDF), TermNet, retrieved 19 December 2020
  80. ^ Gilbert, K. R., & Galloway, D. F., 1978, “Machine Tools”. In Charles Singer, et al., (Eds.), A History of Technology. Oxford, Clarendon Press
  81. ^ Lee, Sidney (Ed.), 1900, Dictionary of National Biography, Vol LXI. Smith Elder, London
  82. ^ Ping, Wang (2011). “A Brief History of Standards and Standardization Organizations: A Chinese Perspective” (PDF). East-West Center Working Papers (117).
  83. ^ “BSI Group Annual Report and Financial Statements 2010, p. 2” (PDF). Retrieved 3 April 2012.
  84. ^ Robert C. McWilliam. BSI: The First Hundred Years. 1901–2001. A Century of Achievement. 2001. Thanet Press. London
  85. ^ “WHO | WHO guidelines approved by the Guidelines Review Committee”. WHO. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
  86. ^ Chris K. Dyer; Patrick T. Moseley; Zempachi Ogumi; David A. J. Rand; Bruno Scrosati Newnes (2010). Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources. p. 540. ISBN 9780444527455.
  87. ^ IEC. “1906 Preliminary Meeting Report, pp. 46–48” (PDF). The minutes from our first meeting. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 May 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2012.
  88. ^ Friendship among equals – Recollections from ISO’s first fifty years (PDF), International Organization for Standardization, 1997, pp. 15–18, ISBN 92-67-10260-5, retrieved 26 December 2013
  89. ^ Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardization, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance, 14 November 2012, retrieved 10 January 2019
  90. ^ Jump up to:a b European Union: Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations Official Journal L é04, 21.7.1998, p. 37–48. (This page also provides references to amendments.) See also European Commission: Enterprise Directorate-General: Vademecum on European Standardisation (this document contains a consolidated version of Directive 98/34/EC, dated 15 November 2003). Accessed 2009-05-05.
  91. ^ ISO “Members”, retrieved Feb 21, 2012.
  92. ^ “Bulgarian Institute for Standardization”. bds-bg.org. Archived from the original on 27 September 2023.
  93. ^ “NBN”. NBN. Archived from the original on 27 November 2022.
  94. ^ “Bureau of Standards Jamaica”. bsj.org.jm. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023.
  95. ^ “EVS standard evs.ee | en”. evs.ee. Archived from the original on 28 March 2023.
  96. ^ “Institut luxembourgeois de la normalisation, de l’accréditation, de la sécurité et qualité des produits et services // Le gouvernement luxembourgeois”. ilnas.gouvernement.lu. Archived from the original on 8 January 2024.
  97. ^ “Home – NEN”. nen.nl. Archived from the original on 17 January 2024.
  98. ^ “Nyitólap”. mszt.hu. Archived from the original on 3 July 2022.
  99. ^ “Organismul Național de Standardizare din România – Portalul tău către standarde și standardizare”. asro.ro. Archived from the original on 26 January 2024.
  100. ^ “Standards Organisation of Nigeria – Nigeria”. son.gov.ng. Archived from the original on 3 February 2024.
  101. ^ “Department of Standards Malaysia – Home”. jsm.gov.my. Archived from the original on 18 January 2024.
  102. ^ Good Standardization Practices (GSP) (1 ed.). Geneva Switzerland: ISO. 2019. ISBN 978-92-67-10986-2.
  103. ^ “Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations”. wto.org. World Trade Organization. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  104. ^ Quoted from ISO/IEC 24751-1:2008: Information technology – Individualized adaptability and accessibility in e-learning, education and training – Part 1: Framework and reference model, p. v.
  105. ^ J. Gregory Sidak (2013). “The Meaning of FRAND, Part I: Royalties”. Criterion Economics, Inc.
  106. ^ International standards and private standards. International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISBN 978-92-67-10518-5.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certification
  107. “Certification”. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Feb 27, 2024.
  108. ^ “Glossary of Important Assessment and Measurement Terms”. NCME. Archived from the original on 2017-07-22. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  109. ^ “Certification Bodies: what is it ?”. www.theinformationstandard.org. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  110. ^ “What Is a Certificate Authority? Certification Authorities Explained”. sectigostore.com. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  111. ^ “How Important Are Professional Certifications?”. www.columbiasouthern.edu. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  112. ^ “Sustainability Certifications: Easy Guide for Consumers & Sellers”. climatesort.com. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  113. ^ “Cybersecurity And Cloud Tech Certifications Pay The Best Salaries In 2020”. www.forbes.com. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  114. ^ “The ROI of Certifications”. certifiedperformance.org. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  115. ^ “Why get a Project Management Professional (PMP®) certification?”. leanmanufacturing.online. Retrieved 2025-02-17.
  116. ^ Cem Kaner (Mar 26, 2014). “Why propose an advanced certification in software testing?”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  117. ^ “Academic Degrees Abbreviations”. Abbreviations.com. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2014. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  118. ^ “Motion Picture Association of America”. mpaa.org. Archived from the original on Dec 30, 2011.
  119. ^ International standards and private standards. International Organization for Standardization. 2010. ISBN 978-92-67-10518-5. Archived from the original on May 21, 2023 – via DocPlayer.
  120. ^ “Attestations of conformity”. CASCO. International Organization for Standardization. Archived from the original on Nov 30, 2023.
  121. ^ “U.S. Conformity Assessment System: 3rd Party Conformity Assessment”. ANSI Standards Portal. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  122. ^ Jump up to:a b “Certifying Software Testers Worldwide – ISTQB® International Software Testing Qualifications Board”. Retrieved November 4, 2014.
  123. ^ “International Institute for Software Testing (IIST) CSTP & CTM Informational Home Page”. Testinginstitute.com. Retrieved January 30, 2014.
  124. ^ “Participatory Guarantee Systems” (PGS) are participatory certification systems which aim to guarantee buyers or users that sustainable production practices have been respected, as recognised by a quality mark or label”. certification-participative.org. Retrieved 2025-02-17.

Share

× How can I help you?