ISO 80079-36:2016

By IT ADMIN ISO 80079-36:2016

ISO 80079-36:2016, titled “Explosive atmospheres – Part 36: Non-electrical equipment for explosive atmospheres – Basic method and requirements”, is a standard that specifies the basic methods and requirements for the design and construction of non-electrical equipment used in explosive atmospheres. This standard is part of the ISO/IEC 80079 series, which addresses equipment used in environments where explosive gases, vapors, mists, or dusts are present.

Key Requirements:

  1. Scope: ISO 80079-36:2016 applies to non-electrical equipment and components that can pose an ignition risk in explosive atmospheres. This includes equipment used in industries such as chemical processing, oil and gas, mining, and others where hazardous environments exist.
  2. Ignition Hazards: The standard outlines the potential ignition sources from non-electrical equipment, such as:
    • Mechanical sparks (e.g., from friction or impact)
    • Hot surfaces
    • Static electricity
    • Chemical reactions
  3. Risk Assessment: Manufacturers are required to conduct a thorough risk assessment of the equipment, identifying possible ignition sources and ensuring mitigation measures are in place.
  4. Design Principles: The standard details the necessary design principles, including robust materials, appropriate sealing to prevent dust or gas ingress, and other safety features to prevent ignition.
  5. Marking: Equipment certified to this standard must be clearly marked to indicate its suitability for explosive atmospheres, with labels showing the level of protection and the hazardous area classification.
  6. Compliance with Other Standards: ISO 80079-36:2016 is often used in conjunction with other standards, such as ISO 80079-37, which covers protective concepts for non-electrical equipment.

Who is Required to Comply:

  • Manufacturers of non-electrical equipment intended for use in explosive atmospheres must design and construct equipment in compliance with ISO 80079-36.
  • Industries operating in hazardous environments, such as oil and gas, mining, and chemical manufacturing, where explosive atmospheres are common.
  • Regulatory Bodies that oversee safety in explosive atmospheres often require compliance with ISO 80079-36 to ensure that equipment is safe for use in these settings.

Benefits:

  • Reducing the risk of explosions caused by non-electrical equipment.
  • Ensuring the safety of personnel working in hazardous environments.
  • Facilitating international trade by providing a globally recognized standard for equipment used in explosive atmospheres.

For more detailed information, the standard can be purchased through official ISO channels or authorized distributors.

What is required
ISO 80079-36:2016

ISO 80079-36:2016 specifies the basic requirements for the design, construction, and risk assessment of non-electrical equipment used in potentially explosive atmospheres. Here’s what is required:

1. Scope and Applicability:

  • Non-electrical equipment that could create ignition sources (like mechanical equipment, pumps, or compressors) used in environments where explosive gases, vapors, or dusts are present.

2. Risk Assessment:

  • Manufacturers must conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify and mitigate all potential ignition hazards related to the equipment. The assessment involves identifying possible ignition sources, including mechanical friction, sparks, static electricity, and more.

3. Design and Construction:

  • Safe Design: Equipment must be designed to minimize ignition risks, such as limiting surface temperatures, avoiding static charges, and ensuring that materials can withstand environmental conditions without creating hazards.
  • Protective Measures: Equipment may need specific protective features, such as increased durability, proper sealing, or special coatings to prevent hazardous substances from igniting.

4. Marking and Labeling:

  • All equipment must be properly marked to indicate compliance with the standard, which includes hazard area classifications, types of protection used, and other critical safety details.

5. Conformance with Other Standards:

  • ISO 80079-36 is part of a broader framework of standards for equipment used in explosive atmospheres, meaning compliance may also require meeting the requirements of related standards (e.g., ISO 80079-37).

6. Documentation:

  • Adequate documentation is necessary to prove compliance, including detailed descriptions of the risk assessments, design decisions, and testing results.

7. Testing and Verification:

  • Equipment needs to be tested and verified to demonstrate that it meets the required safety standards under actual operating conditions.

In summary, ISO 80079-36:2016 requires manufacturers to perform rigorous risk assessments, design equipment with safety features to minimize ignition risks, ensure proper labeling, and document compliance to help prevent accidents in explosive atmospheres.

Who is required
ISO 80079-36:2016

ISO 80079-36:2016 is required for a variety of stakeholders involved in the design, manufacture, and use of non-electrical equipment in potentially explosive atmospheres. Here’s a breakdown of who is required to comply with this standard:

1. Manufacturers:

  • Companies producing non-electrical equipment, such as pumps, compressors, and mechanical devices, must ensure their products meet the requirements outlined in ISO 80079-36. This includes designing equipment to prevent ignition sources in explosive environments .

2. Industry Sectors:

  • Industries that frequently operate in explosive atmospheres, such as oil and gas, chemical manufacturing, mining, and pharmaceuticals, are required to ensure that the non-electrical equipment used complies with this standard .

3. Quality Assurance and Regulatory Bodies:

  • Organizations responsible for regulatory compliance, safety standards, and quality assurance must be familiar with ISO 80079-36 to evaluate equipment and ensure it meets safety requirements for explosive atmospheres .

4. Safety Engineers and Risk Assessors:

  • Professionals involved in safety assessments and risk management must understand the principles of ISO 80079-36 to conduct thorough risk assessments and ensure that equipment is safe for use in explosive environments​.

5. End Users:

  • Companies and personnel operating non-electrical equipment in hazardous locations should verify that the equipment meets ISO 80079-36 standards to ensure operational safety and compliance with legal requirements.

Conclusion:

Compliance with ISO 80079-36:2016 is essential for manufacturers, industry operators, regulatory bodies, safety professionals, and end users to minimize the risks associated with explosive atmospheres. Understanding and adhering to these requirements can significantly enhance workplace safety and reduce the likelihood of hazardous incidents.

For more detailed information, you may refer to sources such as:

When is required
ISO 80079-36:2016

ISO 80079-36:2016 is required in various situations related to the design, manufacture, and use of non-electrical equipment intended for environments with explosive atmospheres. Here are some key instances when compliance is necessary:

1. Equipment Design and Manufacturing:

  • Manufacturers of non-electrical equipment must comply with ISO 80079-36 when designing products intended for use in potentially explosive environments. This includes conducting risk assessments and implementing design principles that minimize ignition risks .

2. Regulatory Compliance:

  • Organizations operating in industries such as oil and gas, mining, and chemical manufacturing may be required by local or international regulations to ensure their non-electrical equipment complies with ISO 80079-36. Regulatory authorities often reference this standard in legislation and safety guidelines .

3. New Equipment Installation:

  • When installing new non-electrical equipment in explosive atmospheres, compliance with ISO 80079-36 is necessary to ensure that the equipment is safe for operation and minimizes the risk of ignition .

4. Periodic Safety Audits and Inspections:

  • Organizations must verify that their existing non-electrical equipment continues to comply with ISO 80079-36 during regular safety audits and inspections. This helps ensure ongoing safety and regulatory compliance.

5. Acquisition of Equipment:

  • Companies purchasing non-electrical equipment for use in hazardous environments should require compliance with ISO 80079-36 as a criterion for procurement to ensure the safety of their operations .

In summary, compliance with ISO 80079-36:2016 is required during the design, manufacturing, installation, and operation of non-electrical equipment in explosive atmospheres, as well as during regulatory assessments and safety audits. For more details, you can refer to .

Where is required
ISO 80079-36:2016

ISO 80079-36:2016 is required in various environments where non-electrical equipment is used in potentially explosive atmospheres. Here are key areas where this standard is applicable:

1. Industrial Settings:

  • Oil and Gas Industry: Facilities involved in the extraction, refining, or transportation of oil and gas often have explosive atmospheres due to flammable gases and vapors. Compliance with ISO 80079-36 is crucial to minimize ignition risks​.
  • Chemical Manufacturing: In plants where chemicals are produced or handled, explosive atmospheres can arise from volatile substances. Equipment must meet ISO 80079-36 standards to ensure safety​ .

2. Mining Operations:

  • Mining sites, especially those dealing with flammable dust or gases, require compliance with ISO 80079-36 for any non-electrical equipment used, such as conveyors and drilling machines, to prevent ignition hazards .

3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing:

  • The pharmaceutical industry often works with solvents and chemicals that can create explosive atmospheres. Equipment must adhere to ISO 80079-36 to ensure safety during production processes​ .

4. Food Processing:

  • In food processing plants, especially those that use powders (like flour) that can create combustible dust, ISO 80079-36 compliance is necessary for equipment to minimize the risk of explosion .

5. Utilities and Waste Management:

  • Facilities involved in waste management, including those processing flammable gases or handling combustible materials, must ensure their non-electrical equipment complies with ISO 80079-36​.

Conclusion:

Compliance with ISO 80079-36:2016 is essential in any location where non-electrical equipment is used in environments with explosive atmospheres, including industrial settings, mining operations, chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing, food processing, and waste management facilities. For further details, you can refer to sources like and .

How is required
ISO 80079-36:2016

Compliance with ISO 80079-36:2016 involves several key steps and processes designed to ensure that non-electrical equipment used in explosive atmospheres is safe and reliable. Here’s how organizations can achieve compliance:

1. Risk Assessment:

  • Conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify potential ignition sources in the operating environment. This includes evaluating the types of explosive atmospheres present (e.g., gas, vapor, dust) and determining the appropriate safety measures for equipment design​

2. Design Principles:

  • Apply design principles that prevent the ignition of explosive atmospheres. This may involve using specific materials, design features, or protective measures that comply with the requirements of ISO 80079-36​

3. Testing and Certification:

  • Engage in testing and certification of equipment to ensure it meets the necessary safety standards. This may include collaboration with accredited testing laboratories that specialize in evaluating non-electrical equipment for explosive environments​

4. Documentation:

  • Maintain comprehensive documentation that outlines the design, testing, and compliance processes for the equipment. This documentation should be available for regulatory inspections and audits​

5. Training and Awareness:

  • Provide training for employees and stakeholders involved in the operation and maintenance of non-electrical equipment. This training should cover safety protocols, equipment handling, and emergency procedures related to explosive atmospheres​

6. Periodic Review and Maintenance:

  • Implement a regular review and maintenance schedule to ensure ongoing compliance with ISO 80079-36. This includes periodic safety audits and inspections to assess the condition and safety of the equipment in use​

Conclusion:

By following these steps, organizations can effectively comply with ISO 80079-36:2016, ensuring that their non-electrical equipment is safe for use in explosive atmospheres. For more detailed information, refer to sources such as and .

Case Study on
ISO 80079-36:2016

Case Study: Implementation of ISO 80079-36:2016 in an Oil and Gas Facility

Background:
An oil and gas exploration company operates offshore drilling rigs and onshore refineries where flammable gases and vapors create potentially explosive atmospheres. The company decided to implement ISO 80079-36:2016 to enhance the safety of its non-electrical equipment, which included conveyors, pumps, and valves.

Objectives:

  • To minimize the risk of ignition in explosive atmospheres.
  • To comply with regulatory requirements and improve safety standards.
  • To enhance operational efficiency by ensuring equipment reliability.

Steps Taken:

  1. Risk Assessment:
    The company conducted a comprehensive risk assessment to identify potential sources of ignition in their facilities. This included analyzing the types of gases present and mapping out areas where non-electrical equipment was in operation.
  2. Design Review:
    A design review of existing non-electrical equipment was conducted. Engineering teams worked on modifying equipment to comply with the design principles outlined in ISO 80079-36. Changes included selecting appropriate materials and implementing features that prevent ignition, such as using explosion-proof housings.
  3. Testing and Certification:
    The modified equipment underwent rigorous testing by an accredited third-party laboratory. The testing process included evaluating the equipment’s performance under simulated explosive conditions to ensure compliance with the ISO standard.
  4. Training and Awareness:
    Employees received training on the new safety protocols and equipment handling procedures. Workshops and drills were conducted to ensure all personnel understood the importance of compliance and how to operate equipment safely in explosive environments.
  5. Documentation and Maintenance:
    Comprehensive documentation of the design changes, testing results, and training sessions was maintained. A maintenance schedule was established to regularly inspect and service the equipment, ensuring ongoing compliance with ISO 80079-36.

Results:

  • The implementation of ISO 80079-36 led to a significant reduction in the number of safety incidents related to equipment ignition.
  • Regulatory compliance was achieved, enhancing the company’s reputation with stakeholders and regulators.
  • Employees reported increased confidence in the safety measures, leading to improved morale and productivity.

Conclusion

The case study illustrates how the application of ISO 80079-36:2016 can significantly enhance safety in environments with explosive atmospheres. By conducting thorough risk assessments, implementing design changes, and fostering a culture of safety, organizations can mitigate risks associated with non-electrical equipment.

For more detailed information about ISO 80079-36:2016, you can refer to sources such as ISO and Standards Australia.

White Paper on
ISO 80079-36:2016

White Paper: Understanding ISO 80079-36:2016

Abstract
ISO 80079-36:2016 is a vital international standard that provides guidelines for the design, testing, and certification of non-electrical equipment used in explosive atmospheres. This white paper aims to elucidate the importance of this standard, its key requirements, and its application in enhancing workplace safety, particularly in industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, and mining.

Introduction

In environments where flammable gases, vapors, and dust are present, the risk of explosion is a significant concern. ISO 80079-36:2016 addresses these risks by establishing criteria for equipment that does not use electrical components. The standard helps ensure that non-electrical equipment is designed and manufactured in a way that minimizes the potential for ignition.

Key Requirements of ISO 80079-36:2016

  1. Design Principles
    The standard emphasizes design aspects that prevent ignition. This includes the selection of materials and construction methods that can withstand potential explosive environments without igniting flammable substances
  2. Testing Protocols
    ISO 80079-36 mandates rigorous testing procedures for non-electrical equipment. This involves simulating the equipment’s performance under various explosive conditions to assess its safety and reliability .
  3. Documentation
    Organizations are required to maintain thorough documentation of design specifications, testing results, and compliance measures. This documentation is crucial for regulatory audits and continuous improvement processes​.
  4. Maintenance and Inspections
    The standard highlights the importance of regular maintenance and inspection schedules to ensure ongoing compliance and safety of equipment in explosive atmospheres​.

Importance of Compliance

Compliance with ISO 80079-36:2016 is not just about meeting regulatory requirements; it plays a critical role in:

  • Enhancing Safety: By adhering to the guidelines, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of explosions and associated hazards​.
  • Improving Operational Efficiency: Reliable equipment reduces downtime and maintenance costs, leading to more efficient operations​.
  • Building Reputation: Organizations that prioritize safety and compliance gain trust from stakeholders, customers, and regulatory bodies​.

Conclusion

ISO 80079-36:2016 serves as a cornerstone for ensuring the safety and reliability of non-electrical equipment in hazardous environments. By following its guidelines, organizations can effectively manage risks associated with explosive atmospheres, protect their employees, and enhance operational efficiency.

References

  1. ISO 80079-36:2016 Overview – ISO Official Website
  2. Standards Australia – Standards for Non-Electrical Equipment
  3. Health and Safety Executive – Safety in Explosive Atmospheres

For further reading and in-depth details about ISO 80079-36:2016, please visit the above links.

  1.  Kenton, Will. “Manufacturing”. Investopedia. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  2. ^ Thadani, Akhil; Allen, Gregory C. (May 30, 2023). “Mapping the Semiconductor Supply Chain: The Critical Role of the Indo-Pacific Region”. CSIS.
  3. ^ Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010). “manufacture, n.“. Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acres/9780199571123.001.0001 (inactive November 1, 2024). ISBN 978-0199571123.
  4. ^ Srivatsan, T. S.; Manigandan, K.; Sudarshan, T. S. (2018). “Use of Conventional Manufacturing Techniques for Materials”. In Srivatsan, T. S.; Sudarshan, T. S.; Manigandan, K. (eds.). Manufacturing Techniques for Materials: Engineering and Engineered. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 436–437. ISBN 978-1138099265.
  5. ^ Youssef, Helmi A.; El-Hofy, Hassan (2008). Machining Technology: Machine Tools and Operations. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-1420043396.
  6. ^ “Human Ancestors Hall: Homo sapiens”. Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  7. ^ “Ancient ‘Tool Factory’ Uncovered”. BBC News. May 6, 1999. Archived from the original on March 18, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  8. ^ Heinzelin, Jean de; Clark, JD; White, T; Hart, W; Renne, P; Woldegabriel, G; Beyene, Y; Vrba, E (April 1999). “Environment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids”. Science. 284 (5414): 625–629. Bibcode:1999Sci…284..625D. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.625. PMID 10213682.
  9. ^ Jump up to:a b Burke, Ariane. “Archaeology”. Encyclopedia Americana. Archived from the original on May 21, 2008. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  10. ^ Plummer, Thomas (2004). “Flaked Stones and Old Bones: Biological and Cultural Evolution at the Dawn of Technology”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Suppl 39 (47). Yearbook of Physical Anthropology: 118–64. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20157. PMID 15605391.
  11. ^ Haviland, William A. (2004). Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. The Thomson Corporation. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-534-62487-3.
  12. ^ Tóth, Zsuzsanna (2012). “The First Neolithic Sites in Central/South-East European Transect, Volume III: The Körös Culture in Eastern Hungary”. In Anders, Alexandra; Siklósi, Zsuzsanna (eds.). Bone, Antler, and Tusk tools of the Early Neolithic Körös Culture. Oxford: BAR International Series 2334.
  13. ^ Jump up to:a b c Merson, John (1990). The Genius That Was China: East and West in the Making of the Modern World. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-87951-397-9.
  14. ^ Paine, Lincoln (2013). The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World. New York: Random House, LLC.
  15. ^ Jane C., Waldbaum (1978). From Bronze to Iron: The Transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in the Eastern Mediterranean. Paul Aström. pp. 56–58. ISBN 91-85058-79-3. OCLC 1146527679.
  16. ^ Photos, E. (1989). “The Question of Meteoritic versus Smelted Nickel-Rich Iron: Archaeological Evidence and Experimental Results”. World Archaeology. 20 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/00438243.1989.9980081. JSTOR 124562. S2CID 5908149.
  17. ^ Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999). Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1575060422.
  18. ^ Potts, D. T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  19. ^ Trzciński, Jerzy; Zaremba, Małgorzata; Rzepka, Sławomir; Welc, Fabian; Szczepański, Tomasz (June 1, 2016). “Preliminary Report on Engineering Properties and Environmental Resistance of Ancient Mud Bricks from Tell El-Retaba Archaeological Site in the Nile Delta”. Studia Quaternaria. 33 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1515/squa-2016-0005. ISSN 2300-0384. S2CID 132452242.
  20. ^ “Timeline: 8th century”. 8th century. ISBN 978-0191735516. Archived from the original on August 25, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  21. ^ de Safita, Neathery (July 2002). “A Brief History Of Paper”. St. Louis Community College. Archived from the original on August 22, 2018. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  22. ^ Marchetti, Cesare (1978). “A Postmortem Technology Assessment of the Spinning Wheel: The Last 1000 Years, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13; pp. 91–93” (PDF). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 2, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  23. ^ Rosen, William (2012). The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry and Invention. University Of Chicago Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-226-72634-2.
  24. ^ “Industrial History of European Countries”. European Route of Industrial Heritage. Council of Europe. Archived from the original on June 23, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  25. ^ Jump up to:a b c Landes, David S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.
  26. ^ Gupta, Bishnupriya. “Cotton Textiles and the Great Divergence: Lancashire, India and Shifting Competitive Advantage, 1600–1850” (PDF). International Institute of Social History. Department of Economics, University of Warwick. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  27. ^ Taylor, George Rogers (1951). The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860. Rinehart. ISBN 978-0-87332-101-3.
  28. ^ Roe, Joseph Wickham (1916). English and American Tool Builders. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. LCCN 16011753. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021. Reprinted by McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1926 (LCCN 27-24075); and by Lindsay Publications, Inc., Bradley, Illinois, (ISBN 978-0-917914-73-7)
  29. ^ Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. p. 18.
  30. ^ Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States and London, England: The MIT Press.
  31. ^ Thomson, Ross (1989). The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1867-1.
  32. ^ Jump up to:a b c Hounshell, David A. (1984). From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-2975-8. LCCN 83016269. OCLC 1104810110.
  33. ^ Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  34. ^ Jerome, Harry (1934). Mechanization in Industry, National Bureau of Economic Research. p. xxviii.
  35. ^ Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press. pp. 14, 15.
  36. ^ Hounshell 1984, p. 288
  37. ^ Ohno, Taiichi (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-915299-14-0.
  38. ^ Shingō, Shigeo (1985). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. ISBN 0-915299-03-8. OCLC 12255263. Archived from the original on January 14, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  39. ^ “Site of BMC/Leyland Australia Manufacturing Plant: Nomination as an Historic Engineering Marker” (PDF). The Institution of Engineers, Australia. September 30, 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  40. ^ Ashburn, A. (July 1977). “Toyota’s “famous Ohno system””. American Machinist: 120–123.
  41. ^ Sugimori, Y.; Kusunoki, K.; Cho, F.; Uchikawa, S. (1977). “Toyota Production System and Kanban System: Materialization of Just-in-time and Respect-for-human System”. International Journal of Production Research. 15 (6): 553–564. doi:10.1080/00207547708943149. ISSN 0020-7543.
  42. ^ “The Founding of the Association for Manufacturing Excellence: Summarized at a Meeting of its Founders, February 2, 2001” (PDF). Target. 17 (3). Association for Manufacturing Excellence: 23–24. 2001. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  43. ^ Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. (1988), Dynamic Manufacturing, New York: The Free Press, quoted in Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., “Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy“, p. 1, INSEAD, published April 6, 1991, accessed September 27, 2023
  44. ^ R. Sarmiento, G. Whelan, M. Thürer and F. A. Bribiescas-Silva, “Fifty Years of the Strategic Trade-Offs Model: In Memory and Honor of Wickham Skinner”, in IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 1 Second Quarter, June 2019, doi:10.1109/EMR.2019.2915978, accessed August 22, 2023
  45. ^ Skinner, W., “Focused Factory“, Harvard Business Review, published May 1, 1974.
  46. ^ Jump up to:a b Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., “Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy“, p. 2, INSEAD, published April 6, 1991, accessed September 27, 2023
  47. ^ Haas, E. A., “Breakthrough Manaufacturing”, Harvard Business Review, March/April 1987, pp. 75–81
  48. ^ Skinner, W., “Missing the Links in Manufacturing Strategy” in Voss, C. A. (ed) (1992), Manufacturing Strategy – Process and Content, Chapman and Hall, pp. 12–25
  49. ^ Hill, T., Manufacturing Strategy: Developments in Approach and Analytics, University of Warwick, 1990, accessed 28 September 2023
  50. ^ Hill, T. (1993), Manufacturing Strategy, second edition, Macmillan, chapter 2
  51. ^ Di Stefano, Cristina; Fratocchi, Luciano; Martínez-Mora, Carmen; Merino, Fernando (August 2, 2023). “Manufacturing reshoring and sustainable development goals: A home versus host country perspective”. Sustainable Development. 32: 863–875. doi:10.1002/sd.2710. hdl:10045/136803.
  52. ^ Young, Julie. “Unit Cost Definition”. investopedia.com. Investopedia. Archived from the original on May 20, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  53. ^ Spence, Michael (1984). “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance”. Econometrica. 52 (1). Econometrica – Journal of the Economic Society, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. 1984): 101–121. doi:10.2307/1911463. JSTOR 1911463. Archived from the original on March 5, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  54. ^ “PPC-R01.2N-N-V2-FW | PPC Controllers | Indramat Controls | Indramat USA”. indramat-usa.com. Retrieved May 30, 2024.
  55. ^ “Manufacturing Program”. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 11, 2019. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  56. ^ “National Occupational Research Agenda for Manufacturing”. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 4, 2019. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  57. ^ Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance (2nd ed.). Manchester: Industrial Systems Research. 2002. ISBN 0-906321-25-5. OCLC 49552466.
  58. ^ Research, Industrial Systems (2002). Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance. Industrial Systems Research. ISBN 978-0-906321-25-6. Archived from the original on April 1, 2021. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
  59. ^ David Bailey; Soyoung Kim (June 26, 2009). “GE’s Immelt says U.S. economy needs industrial renewal”. Reuters. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  60. ^ “Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters?”. February 2012. Archived from the original on October 8, 2012.
  61. ^ Martin Crutsinger (2007). “Factory Jobs: 3 Million Lost Since 2000”. USA Today. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  62. ^ “UNIDO Statistics Data Portal”. Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  63. ^ “Leading Manufacturing Nations”. July 15, 2021. Archived from the original on March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  64. ^ “UNIDO’s Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles”. unido.org. Archived from the original on April 6, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  65. ^ “Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles ( Report)”. stat.unido.org. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  66. ^ “2022 United States Manufacturing Facts”. NAM. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  67. ^ “All Employees, Manufacturing/All Employees, Total Nonfarm*100 | FRED | St. Louis Fed”. fred.stlouisfed.org. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  68. ^ “Employment in manufacturing in January 2023: +1.5% year on year”. Retrieved November 8, 2024.
  69. ^ “Manufacturing, Value Added (Current US$)”. World Bank. Archived from the original on January 7, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2021.

Share

× How can I help you?